Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kennels
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 149

    feature response curve explanation

    Hi,

    Could someone provide a more layman's explanation of how to interpret the feature response curve metric to assess assemblies?
    The following explanation is found at http://bioinformatics.nyu.edu/wordpr...esponse-curve/, and the original paper at http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0019175, but I'm still having trouble understanding. Thank you in advance.

    Inspired by the standard receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Feature-Response curve characterizes the sensitivity (coverage) of the sequence assembler output (contigs) as a function of its discrimination threshold (number of features/errors). The AMOS package provides an automated assembly validation pipeline called amosvalidate that analyzes the output of an assembler using a variety of assembly quality metrics (or features). Examples of features include: (M) mate-pair orientations and separations, (K) repeat content by k-mer analysis, (C) depth-of-coverage, (P) correlated polymorphism in the read alignments, and (B) read alignment breakpoints to identify structurally suspicious regions of the assembly. After running amosvalidate on the output of the assembler, each contig is assigned a number of features that correspond to doubtful regions of the sequence. Given any such set of features, the response (quality) of the assembler output is then analyzed as a function of the maximum number of possible errors (features) allowed in the contigs. More specifically, for a fixed feature threshold φ, the contigs are sorted by size and, starting from the longest, only those contigs are tallied, if their sum of features is . For this set of contigs, the corresponding approximate genome coverage is computed, leading to a single point of the Feature-Response curve.
    Last edited by Kennels; 06-05-2013, 10:21 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
99 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
120 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
0 responses
113 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...