Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sadiexiaoyu
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 57

    #1

    why different read coverage in the same gene in one sample

    Hi, All,

    I am using IGV to view my bam result. And I am confused why there are different read coverage in the same gene. I mean, ideally, the read coverage should be even across the gene. But in some cases (for example, see the two attachments), I found the read coverage is significant difference across gene. Could anyone help explain this? Thanks!

    Best,

    Sadiexiaoyu
    Attached Files
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    This is normal. Firstly, "random hexamer priming" is actually not that random. That leads to a lot of the waviness that you see. Secondly, there are also 5' to 3' biases, caused be the library construction step and RNA degradation. There are also mapability differences across the length of a gene (which can interact with the SNPs that are present in samples).

    Comment

    • sadiexiaoyu
      Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 57

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      This is normal. Firstly, "random hexamer priming" is actually not that random. That leads to a lot of the waviness that you see. Secondly, there are also 5' to 3' biases, caused be the library construction step and RNA degradation. There are also mapability differences across the length of a gene (which can interact with the SNPs that are present in samples).
      Hi, dpryan,

      Thanks!

      Best,

      Sadiexiaoyu

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
        by SEQadmin2



        CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

        Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
        ...
        07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
        by SEQadmin2


        Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

        The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
        ...
        07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
      0 responses
      32 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
      0 responses
      50 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...