Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShellfishGene
    Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 14

    Methods for 'exploratory analysis' of sequenced non-model organism transcriptomes

    With the price of next gen sequencing being as low as it is now, often whole runs are used for single experiments to answer specific questions. After this is done, the quesiton of 'what else can we do with the data?' comes up. (Or, and unfortunately this is becoming more common, there is no specific question at all before sequencing, it's done 'just to see what comes out of it'.) As a bioinformatician you then get a load of transcriptome reads, and that question.
    What do you do in that case? Especially for non-model organisms, where you don't have a genome to map to?

    The most obvious steps are assembly and blastx, maybe with GO annoation using something like Blast2GO. RNA-Seq is also possible, but of limited use without a comparison. Maybe one can find highly expressed genes that don't have a blast match anywhere and are thus interesting.
    What are other ideas for 'exploratory analysis' of non-model organism transcriptomes?
  • colindaven
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 417

    #2
    Hi,

    we have plenty of de novo assembled contigs from bacterial genome resequencing projects which don t have matches (on blastn and blastx levels).
    We have treated these as dodgy low confidence contigs to date and have not used them further.

    With transcriptomes I would be wary of novel contigs. Maybe oligonucleotide usage would be interesting if the contigs are more than 1000 bp to see if the contigs are possibly novel transcripts or assembly / sequencing errors.

    I would definitely recommend BLAST against metagenomic DBs such as those at CAMERA.

    Comment

    • jordi
      Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 49

      #3
      Hi,
      maybe that post is too old, but I think it's very interesting what to do with the thousands of reads from a next-generation platform without a reference genome. Given, for instance, the 454 read length, why not try to blast them directly?? Besides, usually, those not included in a contig (singletons) are treated as a unigenes. We were looking for a specific proteins in a 454 transcriptome from a non-model specie. According to this we tried to align the 6 frames translation of each read to an aminoacid reference sequence from the closer phylogenetically specie.
      What do you think about this approach??
      Regards

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...