Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lran2008
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 35

    #1

    different results from fastQC and fastx toolkits

    Hi,

    I am using fastQC to check the quality of my miRNA seq data after adaptor trimming. Then I used fastq_quality_boxplot_graph.sh from fastx toolkits to see if the results are the same as fastQC. Surprisingly, it seems that with fastq_quality_boxplot_graph.sh, the quality scores are lower (some below 30) whereas they are all above 30 using fastQC.

    Could anybody tell me why there is so big difference?

    There is another thread:
    Discussion of next-gen sequencing related bioinformatics: resources, algorithms, open source efforts, etc


    But in my case, I believe that all the reads have been read by fastQC or fastq_quality_boxplot_graph.sh, which can be known from their statistics.

    There is indeed a very small percentage of reads which contain N. Could that be the problem? I am looking for some tools to get rid of the reads with N.

    Attached are the results from fastQC and fastq_quality_boxplot_graph.sh. Thanks.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	fastqc.png
Views:	1
Size:	37.0 KB
ID:	308157Click image for larger version

Name:	fastx_tool.png
Views:	1
Size:	19.7 KB
ID:	308158
  • JackieBadger
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 385

    #2
    Fastqc is smart and detected that your quality encoding. Fastq_quality_boxplot is not smart and didn't detect your encoding. As such, the later is plotting your scores on the solexa quality scale...hence values below zero.

    Comment

    • JackieBadger
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 385

      #3
      try http://edwards.sdsu.edu/cgi-bin/prinseq/prinseq.cgi

      Comment

      • lran2008
        Member
        • Apr 2013
        • 35

        #4
        Originally posted by JackieBadger View Post
        Fastqc is smart and detected that your quality encoding. Fastq_quality_boxplot is not smart and didn't detect your encoding. As such, the later is plotting your scores on the solexa quality scale...hence values below zero.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format
        Hi,
        Thanks for your reply. The input of Fastq_quality_boxplot is the text file produced by fastx_quality_stats. I have specified -Q33 in fastx_quality_stats to get the test file. In this way, the encoding should be detected. And do you mean that results from fastQC are more reliable?

        Comment

        • JackieBadger
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 385

          #5
          Take a look at what the program actually does.

          "FASTQ Quality Chart

          $ fastq_quality_boxplot_graph.sh -h
          Solexa-Quality BoxPlot plotter
          Generates a solexa quality score box-plot graph "

          So unless you have Solexa encoding, its no use to you.

          FastqToolkit is glitchy and kind of out dated..... people have re-written many of the functions to perform better
          Last edited by JackieBadger; 06-18-2013, 10:49 AM.

          Comment

          • lran2008
            Member
            • Apr 2013
            • 35

            #6
            Originally posted by JackieBadger View Post
            Take a look at what the program actually does.

            "FASTQ Quality Chart

            $ fastq_quality_boxplot_graph.sh -h
            Solexa-Quality BoxPlot plotter
            Generates a solexa quality score box-plot graph "

            So unless you have Solexa encoding, its no use to you.

            FastqToolkit is glitchy and kind of out dated..... people have re-written many of the functions to perform better
            Ok, thanks.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            39 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            45 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...