Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pag
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 72

    #16
    setting -m 2 is processing many more blocks. However, even at m=5 it was near-instant.

    I noticed a section "What happens when my sample is a mixture, or diploid?" in the Quiver FAQ

    Does this mean accuracy is suspect also for genomes with transposable elements?

    Comment

    • dalexander
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2013
      • 7

      #17
      Quiver is jumping over the regions with inadequate effective coverage [== coverage after MapQV filter]. My understanding was you had close to 30x coverage?

      You can try --minMapQV=0 --minCoverage=0 to completely disable input filtering, try it.
      MapQV is effectively quantized at either 0 or 255 in my experience.

      Comment

      • pag
        Member
        • May 2012
        • 72

        #18
        yes, according to MIRA's mapping assembly (after pacbio error-correction), I have 30x coverage. There are a couple of problem regions of course (chiefly involving the transposons)

        Comment

        • dalexander
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2013
          • 7

          #19
          Well, try turning off the mapQV filter and see what happens. The remaining explanation is that your draft assembly contigs are either redundant or ridiculously repetitive, so there is no confidence in the mapping.

          Comment

          • dalexander
            Junior Member
            • Jun 2013
            • 7

            #20
            pag, if you are still having difficulties I can get you in touch with our tech support. Let me know.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            55 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...