Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • adumitri
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 27

    #1

    DEXSeq with experimental variables

    Hi,

    Can anyone let me know if the formulae displayed below are accurate when trying to account for two different experimental variables (batch and age) with DEXSeq? Also, what does the "I(exon == exonID)" in the regression model do? Thank you!

    Code:
    formuladispersion <- count ~ sample + (condition + batch + age) * exon
    --> formuladispersion used with the estimateDispersions() function

    Code:
    formula0 <- count ~ sample + batch * exon + age * exon + condition
    formula1 <- count ~ sample + batch * exon + age * exon + condition * I (exon == exonID)
    --> formula0 and formula1 used with the testForDEU() function
  • areyes
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 165

    #2
    Hi @adimitri,

    If I understood, you want to see differences between conditions using as blocking factors the batch and age of your samples right? If that is the case, your dispersion formula looks good, and your formulas for testing should be:

    formula0 <- count ~ sample + (batch + age) * exon + condition
    formula1 <- count ~ sample + (batch + age) * exon + condition * I(exon == exonID)

    the I(exon == exonID) is a way to specify the contrast with a specific exon, if you have a look inside the testGeneForDEU function, you will see that exonID is a variable that iterates through each exon id from each gene.

    Alejandro

    Comment

    • adumitri
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 27

      #3
      Hi Alejandro,

      Thank you for your answer - this is exactly what I was looking for!

      Alexandra

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • kinpict.com
        Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by kinpict.com
        The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
        Today, 06:37 PM
      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2





        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
        10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
      2 responses
      56 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post kinpict.com  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      175 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...