Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marianaboroni
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 5

    DEXSeq output

    Hi!

    I've used the DESeq package and now I'm trying the DEXSeq one.

    In the DESeq package I can access the baseMean, baseMeanA, baseMeanB values after doing the analysis as a output result, but using the DEXSeq package, I only get the meanBase value.


    OUTPUT DEXSeq:

    > res1 <- DEUresultTable(ecs)
    > head(res1)
    geneID exonID dispersion pvalue padjust meanBase log2fold(all/sl)
    Smp_156060:E015 Smp_156060 E015 0.65669650 4.329870e-15 6.934596e-12 19.147740 -2.023423
    Smp_141410:E001 Smp_141410 E001 0.48777320 2.455751e-06 7.733547e-04 7.941987 -1.977033
    Smp_080520:E001 Smp_080520 E001 0.08365269 1.022540e-08 5.789747e-06 13.344642 -1.944765
    Smp_194240:E001 Smp_194240 E001 0.33620393 4.173149e-06 1.285307e-03 2.973169 -1.930388
    Smp_034190:E001 Smp_034190 E001 0.04309263 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 30.344916 -1.691994
    Smp_091390:E001 Smp_091390 E001 0.07264235 0.000000e+00 0.000000e+00 15.738090 -1.682837

    OUTPUT DESeq:

    > res1 <- nbinomTest( cds, "sl", "all" )
    > head(res1)
    id baseMean baseMeanA baseMeanB foldChange log2FoldChange pval padj
    1 Schisto_mansoni.mitochondria_rRNA1 1.081107e+04 2.668263 24321.567008 9115.130 13.15405 8.314941e-11 7.132301e-09
    2 Schisto_mansoni.mitochondria_rRNA2 7.196552e+03 1.820197 16189.965875 8894.625 13.11872 7.980118e-06 5.303116e-05
    3 Sm_mito_tRNA10.1 2.092785e+00 0.000000 4.708767 Inf Inf 3.392875e-01 5.555647e-01
    4 Sm_mito_tRNA11.1 7.391640e-01 0.000000 1.663119 Inf Inf 8.837895e-01 1.000000e+00
    5 Sm_mito_tRNA12.1 6.149918e-01 0.000000 1.383732 Inf Inf 1.000000e+00 1.000000e+00
    6 Sm_mito_tRNA13.1 9.076016e-01 0.000000 2.042104 Inf Inf 8.429498e-01 1.000000e+00
    How can I get the baseMeanA baseMeanB values using the DEXSeq package?

    Thanks!

    []s

    Mariana
  • areyes
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 165

    #2
    Hi Mariana,

    If you are interested in the exon expression, you could just calculate the mean accross the raw counts. If you are interested in the fitted splicing coefficients (what is plotted in plotDEXSeq) you could have a look at the function estimatelog2FoldChanges to get this coefficients, especifically you have to set the parameter getOnlyEffects=TRUE.

    Alejandro

    Comment

    • zorin
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2014
      • 2

      #3
      DEXseq meanBaseA meanBaseB

      Could you please post some sample code how to extract the relevant coefficients in order to obtain proper meanBaseA / meanBaseB values in the DEUresultTable.
      I'm new to DEXseq and would highly appreciate your input.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        Yesterday, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      9 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...