Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • samchen
    replied
    I met the same problem.
    There are some non-numericl values of your fpkms/rpkms.
    NOISeq doesn't recognise the values like "2.24343e-2" because it can't be translated into "0.0224343". However, you can use "2.24343E-2".
    Try it. Finally, I got the results.

    Leave a comment:


  • 11xinqi
    replied
    Originally posted by NitaC View Post
    Good morning all!

    Recently I've been doing comparisons of differential expression calling of several different packages. Really, I've been comparing Cufflinks against other count-based approaches. I also have used NOISeq with raw counts but it says in documentation that it can do rpkm. Sooo, I wanted to take the fpkm values from Cufflinks and use them in NOISeq. Seemed simple enough...

    However, I keep getting this: "Error in rowSums(as.matrix(datos1)) : 'x' must be numeric" and "Error in round(datos1, 100) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function".

    Now, I've specifically imported my file and forced it to be a numeric data matrix so now I'm lost as to what else to try. Has anyone else had this problem? Is NOISeq not capable of using these fpkm values?

    Thanks in advance!
    Hi,

    I am doing the same job. I have 2 samples and each sample has 3 biological replicates. Would you give me a pipeline about how to make NOISeq work with FPKM ? Thank you very much

    Leave a comment:


  • NitaC
    replied
    I think I agree sdriscoll.

    One question though: With NOISeq, do you keep k=0 when using FPKMs or do you use k=.5 (or some other small number)?

    Leave a comment:


  • sdriscoll
    replied
    I actually think the NOISeq method performs better with FPKMs.

    Leave a comment:


  • NitaC
    replied
    *Problem Solved*

    In case anyone ever comes across this, I wanted to note that the problem was with R not NOISeq. I had an issue with one column being treated as factors rather than numeric data. As I'm also a newb to R, this was an unexpected issue. However, now that the data is indeed numeric, NOISeq is working just fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • NitaC
    started a topic NOISeq with fpkm values

    NOISeq with fpkm values

    Good morning all!

    Recently I've been doing comparisons of differential expression calling of several different packages. Really, I've been comparing Cufflinks against other count-based approaches. I also have used NOISeq with raw counts but it says in documentation that it can do rpkm. Sooo, I wanted to take the fpkm values from Cufflinks and use them in NOISeq. Seemed simple enough...

    However, I keep getting this: "Error in rowSums(as.matrix(datos1)) : 'x' must be numeric" and "Error in round(datos1, 100) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function".

    Now, I've specifically imported my file and forced it to be a numeric data matrix so now I'm lost as to what else to try. Has anyone else had this problem? Is NOISeq not capable of using these fpkm values?

    Thanks in advance!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...