Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • samchen
    replied
    I met the same problem.
    There are some non-numericl values of your fpkms/rpkms.
    NOISeq doesn't recognise the values like "2.24343e-2" because it can't be translated into "0.0224343". However, you can use "2.24343E-2".
    Try it. Finally, I got the results.

    Leave a comment:


  • 11xinqi
    replied
    Originally posted by NitaC View Post
    Good morning all!

    Recently I've been doing comparisons of differential expression calling of several different packages. Really, I've been comparing Cufflinks against other count-based approaches. I also have used NOISeq with raw counts but it says in documentation that it can do rpkm. Sooo, I wanted to take the fpkm values from Cufflinks and use them in NOISeq. Seemed simple enough...

    However, I keep getting this: "Error in rowSums(as.matrix(datos1)) : 'x' must be numeric" and "Error in round(datos1, 100) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function".

    Now, I've specifically imported my file and forced it to be a numeric data matrix so now I'm lost as to what else to try. Has anyone else had this problem? Is NOISeq not capable of using these fpkm values?

    Thanks in advance!
    Hi,

    I am doing the same job. I have 2 samples and each sample has 3 biological replicates. Would you give me a pipeline about how to make NOISeq work with FPKM ? Thank you very much

    Leave a comment:


  • NitaC
    replied
    I think I agree sdriscoll.

    One question though: With NOISeq, do you keep k=0 when using FPKMs or do you use k=.5 (or some other small number)?

    Leave a comment:


  • sdriscoll
    replied
    I actually think the NOISeq method performs better with FPKMs.

    Leave a comment:


  • NitaC
    replied
    *Problem Solved*

    In case anyone ever comes across this, I wanted to note that the problem was with R not NOISeq. I had an issue with one column being treated as factors rather than numeric data. As I'm also a newb to R, this was an unexpected issue. However, now that the data is indeed numeric, NOISeq is working just fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • NitaC
    started a topic NOISeq with fpkm values

    NOISeq with fpkm values

    Good morning all!

    Recently I've been doing comparisons of differential expression calling of several different packages. Really, I've been comparing Cufflinks against other count-based approaches. I also have used NOISeq with raw counts but it says in documentation that it can do rpkm. Sooo, I wanted to take the fpkm values from Cufflinks and use them in NOISeq. Seemed simple enough...

    However, I keep getting this: "Error in rowSums(as.matrix(datos1)) : 'x' must be numeric" and "Error in round(datos1, 100) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function".

    Now, I've specifically imported my file and forced it to be a numeric data matrix so now I'm lost as to what else to try. Has anyone else had this problem? Is NOISeq not capable of using these fpkm values?

    Thanks in advance!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • noor121
    Reply to Latest Developments in Precision Medicine
    by noor121
    Qadri offers efficient online services designed for students and staff of University Targu Mures Medical Campus Hamburg. We streamline your academic and administrative processes for a hassle-free experience.

    VIsit us:
    https://qadri-international.com/univ...s-hamburg-umch...
    Today, 09:33 PM
  • seqadmin
    Non-Coding RNA Research and Technologies
    by seqadmin




    Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) do not code for proteins but play important roles in numerous cellular processes including gene silencing, developmental pathways, and more. There are numerous types including microRNA (miRNA), long ncRNA (lncRNA), circular RNA (circRNA), and more. In this article, we discuss innovative ncRNA research and explore recent technological advancements that improve the study of ncRNAs.

    Nobel Prize for MicroRNA Discovery
    This week,...
    Yesterday, 08:07 AM
  • seqadmin
    Recent Developments in Metagenomics
    by seqadmin





    Metagenomics has improved the way researchers study microorganisms across diverse environments. Historically, studying microorganisms relied on culturing them in the lab, a method that limits the investigation of many species since most are unculturable1. Metagenomics overcomes these issues by allowing the study of microorganisms regardless of their ability to be cultured or the environments they inhabit. Over time, the field has evolved, especially with the advent...
    09-23-2024, 06:35 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 10-02-2024, 04:51 AM
0 responses
96 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 10-01-2024, 07:10 AM
0 responses
107 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 09-30-2024, 08:33 AM
1 response
109 views
0 likes
Last Post EmiTom
by EmiTom
 
Started by seqadmin, 09-26-2024, 12:57 PM
0 responses
20 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X