Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NitaC
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 17

    #1

    NOISeq with fpkm values

    Good morning all!

    Recently I've been doing comparisons of differential expression calling of several different packages. Really, I've been comparing Cufflinks against other count-based approaches. I also have used NOISeq with raw counts but it says in documentation that it can do rpkm. Sooo, I wanted to take the fpkm values from Cufflinks and use them in NOISeq. Seemed simple enough...

    However, I keep getting this: "Error in rowSums(as.matrix(datos1)) : 'x' must be numeric" and "Error in round(datos1, 100) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function".

    Now, I've specifically imported my file and forced it to be a numeric data matrix so now I'm lost as to what else to try. Has anyone else had this problem? Is NOISeq not capable of using these fpkm values?

    Thanks in advance!
  • NitaC
    Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 17

    #2
    *Problem Solved*

    In case anyone ever comes across this, I wanted to note that the problem was with R not NOISeq. I had an issue with one column being treated as factors rather than numeric data. As I'm also a newb to R, this was an unexpected issue. However, now that the data is indeed numeric, NOISeq is working just fine.

    Comment

    • sdriscoll
      I like code
      • Sep 2009
      • 436

      #3
      I actually think the NOISeq method performs better with FPKMs.
      /* Shawn Driscoll, Gene Expression Laboratory, Pfaff
      Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA */

      Comment

      • NitaC
        Member
        • Apr 2013
        • 17

        #4
        I think I agree sdriscoll.

        One question though: With NOISeq, do you keep k=0 when using FPKMs or do you use k=.5 (or some other small number)?

        Comment

        • 11xinqi
          Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 31

          #5
          Originally posted by NitaC View Post
          Good morning all!

          Recently I've been doing comparisons of differential expression calling of several different packages. Really, I've been comparing Cufflinks against other count-based approaches. I also have used NOISeq with raw counts but it says in documentation that it can do rpkm. Sooo, I wanted to take the fpkm values from Cufflinks and use them in NOISeq. Seemed simple enough...

          However, I keep getting this: "Error in rowSums(as.matrix(datos1)) : 'x' must be numeric" and "Error in round(datos1, 100) : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function".

          Now, I've specifically imported my file and forced it to be a numeric data matrix so now I'm lost as to what else to try. Has anyone else had this problem? Is NOISeq not capable of using these fpkm values?

          Thanks in advance!
          Hi,

          I am doing the same job. I have 2 samples and each sample has 3 biological replicates. Would you give me a pipeline about how to make NOISeq work with FPKM ? Thank you very much

          Comment

          • samchen
            Junior Member
            • Feb 2013
            • 1

            #6
            I met the same problem.
            There are some non-numericl values of your fpkms/rpkms.
            NOISeq doesn't recognise the values like "2.24343e-2" because it can't be translated into "0.0224343". However, you can use "2.24343E-2".
            Try it. Finally, I got the results.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • kinpict.com
              Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by kinpict.com
              The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
              Today, 06:37 PM
            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            2 responses
            56 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post kinpict.com  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            175 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...