[nareshvasani]

Thanks Brian and westerman for your input and suggestion

[westerman]

Yeah, what Brian said.

[Brian Bushnell]

Rather than typing just "bowtie2", use the full absolute path to the new bowtie2 executable. Or you can put that in your PATH environment variable.

[westerman]

Removal should be good. I suspect a PATH problem. Either your path is not pointing to the newer version or the path points to the older version before it points to the new version. You could also not have the execute bit set on the new version. Once again sysadmin trivia that you'll need to solve on your own.

[nareshvasani]

ohh okay.

I don't have much expertise in system administraion.
Actually I installed new bowtie2 version but I was not able to excetue it. Whenever I type bowtie2, only older version will work not new version so i thought i will uninstall older version.

Thanks,
naresh

[westerman]

As for the sudden increase in file size ... maybe the program was working and your 'ls' just wasn't keeping up? That would be strange but I suppose possible in some circumstances.

As for an uninstall ... gee, I hate sysadmin questions since they are dependent on your particular setup and your expertise in system administration -- but I suspect that using an 'rm' on your old version would get rid of it. :-)

Basically if you need more help in the uninstall/install process you will have to tell us more about your system and how you tend to install programs in the first place.

[nareshvasani]

Hey Westerman,

I installed new version but I was not succesful to use it, so i decided to stick with older version (Bowtie 2 version 2.0.0-beta5)

One interesting thing happen, when I terminated process the size of output file changes to 285.7mb and 3.2gb.

Any suggestion how can i uninstall older version of bowtie2?

Thanks,
Naresh

[westerman]

You must have a different version than I do (bowtie2-2.2.4) since '-M' doesn't show up on my help nor do I see it in the online manual (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/manual.shtml)

You do have some sort of problem. The output file sizes should be increasing. You have used up almost all of your memory which is rarely a good sign. I would stop the process and try something else. My suggestions:

1) Remove the '-M 1'. As far as I can tell it was an option in older bowtie2 and bowtie but is no longer needed.

2) Probably more important, make sure you are running the latest version of bowtie2.

[nareshvasani]

Hi Westerman,

Thanks for your prompt reply. I used -M option for below reason.

-M <int> look for up to <int>+1 alns; report best, with MAPQ (5 for --end-to-end, 2 for --local)

I checked memory, I think there still some memory left:
[root@Victor-20 ~]# free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 49457456 48185040 1272416 0 15368076 29318996
-/+ buffers/cache: 3497968 45959488
Swap: 70364156 73684 70290472

Input file has 17 million reads.

Output file (unaligned and aligned) size is not increasing, it is still same when program was started i.e
450kb and 32kb. That's why I am worried little bit.

Thanks,
Naresh

[westerman]

I don't recognize the '-M' option. Assuming it is valid then my suggestion is to raise the number of threads (-p) if your system has more than 2 processors in it. Also check to make sure you are not running out of memory. The command 'free' can help with this.

You can also look at the size of your output files. Are they increasing in size? The unaligned plus the aligned will eventually get to the size of the input file. Honestly 1+ hour is nothing for anything sizable. If the process goes over 12 hours then you have problem.

[nareshvasani]

Hi Westerman,

I am using bowtie2 for rRNA removal:

Step1: Create Index

# bowtie2-build rRNA.fasta rRNA.index

Step 2: Align to rRNA index inorder to get rRNA free fastq file.
Input fastq file is not that big

# bowtie2 -p 2 -M 1 -q -U /filter_clean.fastq --un fasqFileWithoutrRNA -x rRNA.index --al aligned to rRNA.fastq

It is taking long to do alignment (More than 1hour and still running).

Can you please shed some light on this. Am I doing something wrong?

I would really appreciate your help.

Thanks,
Naresh

[westerman]

I see what you mean -- the manual suggests the bowtie2 is good for large genomes while Blast (and others) are good for shorter genomes. The rRNA/tRNAs would indeed a be a short "genome".

Really either program can be used either way -- the manual just says "... [short genomes] can be done with Bowtie 2 but you may want to consider ... Blast ..."

All I can say is that I use bowtie2 for rRNA removal and am satisfied with it. It may not catch every rRNA but unless I know exactly what rRNAs I have then 95+% accuracy is good enough. Bowtie is quick to run and easy to use since it generates the desired output file.

[lran2008]

Bowtie2 ... not bowtie ... will perform what you want much faster and probably better than blast. Bowtie2, as adam_ie suggests, will create an output file of unaligned sequences. Blast will not do this thus you will have to run additional steps to parse the Blast output.

If you are looking at literature that is over 2 years old and/or does not talk specifically about bowtie2 versus blastn then I suggest just ignoring that literature's advice.

Hi, thank you for your suggestions. I will try to use bowtie 2 instead. But I am still not sure as Bowtie 2 or bowtie works best when aligning to large genomes according to their manual(http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bo...-isnt-bowtie-2). So could bowtie 2 just replace blast for this job?

[westerman]

Bowtie2 ... not bowtie ... will perform what you want much faster and probably better than blast. Bowtie2, as adam_ie suggests, will create an output file of unaligned sequences. Blast will not do this thus you will have to run additional steps to parse the Blast output.

If you are looking at literature that is over 2 years old and/or does not talk specifically about bowtie2 versus blastn then I suggest just ignoring that literature's advice.

[lran2008]

Hi there, the rRNA sequences should be available in NCBI if your genome is sequenced - and get your tRNA sequences from Rfam, which is available through Biomart here: http://xfam-biomart.sanger.ac.uk/ - download the tRNA sequences for your genome.

Then create a multi-FASTA file with all the rRNA and tRNA sequences inside it, build a Bowtie index of this multi-FASTA file, and align your reads against it.

You can keep the unaligned reads then which do not map to rRNA or tRNA.

For example:

bowtie --best --un <unaligned_reads_file.fq> index_of_rRNAs_and_tRNAs <input_fastq_file>

That should do the trick, then align unaligned_reads_file.fq against your genome.

Hi Adam,

Your guidelines are very helpful! I am new in this area and I have been looking for ways to download rRNA/tRNA data. Bowtie can do the job, but blastn should preform better as is suggested in some literature I got. Is it correct? Do you have any idea on how to use blastn to perform this work?