Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jfreimer
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 1

    #1

    Cuffdiff vastly different results

    Hi,
    I'm new to RNA seq analysis and have been having some weird results. I have cell type A that I'm differentiating into cell type B. I have grown these cell types in two similar, but slightly different media conditions, which I'll just call 1 and 2. Since this is a preliminary experiment I was sharing a flowcell with other samples and do not have replicates for each condition.

    I have mapped them all to the genome and have sorted bam files which I used as input for cuffdiff. I am just looking at differences in the reference transcripts and so I've been skipping cufflinks and using the reference annotation gtf file that you can download from Illumina/the cufflinks website.

    When I compare cell type A to cell type B in media 1 there are 0 genes significantly different. I see the same thing in media 2. However, if I treat cell type A in media 1 and 2 as replicates and cell type B in media 1 and 2 as replicates I now see ~ 8700 genes significantly different between the two cell types. Is this just because the cell types are too different to call significantly different genes without replicates?

    Here is what my run command looks like for the single samples:
    cuffdiff -b /N/dc/scratch/tg-jfreimer/UCSC_mm10_bowtie/Sequence/WholeGenomeFasta/genome.fa -u --library-type fr-firststrand --dispersion-method blind /N/dc/scratch/tg-jfreimer/UCSC_mm10_bowtie/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf A-1.sorted.bam B-1.sorted.bam

    and for replicates
    cuffdiff -b /N/dc/scratch/tg-jfreimer/UCSC_mm10_bowtie/Sequence/WholeGenomeFasta/genome.fa -u --library-type fr-firststrand /N/dc/scratch/tg-jfreimer/UCSC_mm10_bowtie/Annotation/Genes/genes.gtf A-1.sorted.bam,A-2.sorted.bam B-1.sorted.bam,B-2.sorted.bam

    Thanks for any help!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    Regardless of how similar or dissimilar the conditions are, you'll always need replicates to get meaningful results. Next time, just get a lane for yourself (they're relatively cheap) and stick a few replicates on it.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • kinpict.com
      Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by kinpict.com
      The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
      Today, 06:37 PM
    • SEQadmin2
      16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
      by SEQadmin2





      NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
      10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
    0 responses
    27 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
    0 responses
    35 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
    2 responses
    56 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post kinpict.com  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
    0 responses
    175 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...