Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • felipelira3
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 11

    Uninstall MIRA assembler

    I am trying to install the new version of MIRA 4 but I think that itś necessary to uninstall the oldest version.

    Does anyone can help me with it?

    Thank you
  • SES
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 275

    #2
    I don't think this would be necessary. The program names have not changed (to my knowledge), and installing should just replace the old binaries. You can just compile mira and use it in place, or install it and that should give you the latest version in your path.

    Comment

    • felipelira3
      Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 11

      #3
      problem almost solved

      Now it reclains the TCmalloc library.
      I tried to do what recommends the MIRA manual, but didn works:

      sudo apt-get install make flex libgoogle-perftools-dev
      sudo apt-get install libboost-doc libboost.*1.48-dev libboost.*1.48.0

      Any suggestion?

      Comment

      • SES
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 275

        #4
        You will have to clarify what you mean by "didn't work." It looks like you are trying to install dependencies for mira, so I'm guessing you had troubles with installation. What exactly are the issues you are experiencing, and what are the messages you see?

        Comment

        • felipelira3
          Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 11

          #5
          Yes, I have a problem. I saw that the MIRA installed before was installed by Ubuntu Software Center. It made it easier. I uninstalled it and now I'm having some problems with the new version.

          The message that appears after "./configure" is:

          "Could not find the tcmalloc library. It is part of the Google perftools library at
          http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/downloads/list"

          I looked for this files and I saw that they are installed.

          Comment

          • GenoMax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2008
            • 7142

            #6
            Originally posted by felipelira3 View Post
            Now it reclains the TCmalloc library.
            I tried to do what recommends the MIRA manual, but didn works:

            sudo apt-get install make flex libgoogle-perftools-dev
            sudo apt-get install libboost-doc libboost.*1.48-dev libboost.*1.48.0

            Any suggestion?
            Are you referring to missing libtcmalloc? You should be able to get that from libtcmalloc-minimal4 perhaps (or libgoogle-perftools-dev).

            Comment

            • felipelira3
              Member
              • Oct 2012
              • 11

              #7
              Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
              Are you referring to missing libtcmalloc? You should be able to get that from libtcmalloc-minimal4 perhaps (or libgoogle-perftools-dev).
              It would be installed unsing "sudo apt-get install make flex libgoogle-perftools-dev", doesn it?

              Comment

              • GenoMax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2008
                • 7142

                #8
                Following should be enough I think.

                Originally posted by felipelira3 View Post
                "sudo apt-get install libgoogle-perftools-dev"

                Comment

                • felipelira3
                  Member
                  • Oct 2012
                  • 11

                  #9
                  Hi GenoMax

                  I will try to follow all the steps from the begin, since download the file mira-4.0rc1.tar.bz2.
                  If I have any problem, I'll describe it here.

                  Thank you a lot!

                  Comment

                  • sklages
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2008
                    • 628

                    #10
                    Any reason why you don't want to use the precompiled binaries? This is usually easier (especially if your are not an expert compiling software on your own).

                    Comment

                    • felipelira3
                      Member
                      • Oct 2012
                      • 11

                      #11
                      Originally posted by sklages View Post
                      Any reason why you don't want to use the precompiled binaries? This is usually easier (especially if your are not an expert compiling software on your own).
                      It will be my last alternative. I am trying to learn how to compile it. Thank you!

                      Comment

                      • felipelira3
                        Member
                        • Oct 2012
                        • 11

                        #12
                        Thank you for your attention about helping me with the mira4 installation. But now I have a doubt.

                        How can I insert the parameter at the manifest to avoid the large sequence names with more then 40 letters and ignore it to follow the assembly steps?

                        Comment

                        • sklages
                          Senior Member
                          • May 2008
                          • 628

                          #13
                          Why don't you read the manual? Have a look at it and search for "check_maxreadnamelength".

                          Comment

                          • felipelira3
                            Member
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 11

                            #14
                            Thank you

                            Originally posted by sklages View Post
                            Why don't you read the manual? Have a look at it and search for "check_maxreadnamelength".
                            I solved the problem by myself but didn have time to put it here. Thank you for your attention.

                            The problem was because I was using the SOLEXA_SETTINGS instead the COMMON_SETTINGS to skip the reads name length. My alternative was:

                            project = assembly_bs10_3
                            job = genome,denovo,accurate
                            parameters = COMMON_SETTINGS -NW:cmrnl=no

                            But, if you have another alternative to this, we wil be too glad if you share it with us...

                            Have a good day

                            Comment

                            • sklages
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2008
                              • 628

                              #15
                              No alternative. Makes sense that "check_maxreadnamelength/maxreadnamelength" is COMMON_SETTINGS as it is technology-independent. Downstream programs may run into problems with very long readnames, no matter which technology.

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • SEQadmin2
                                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                by SEQadmin2


                                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                              • SEQadmin2
                                From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                                by SEQadmin2


                                Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                                The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                                ...
                                06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:37 AM
                              0 responses
                              5 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                              0 responses
                              16 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                              0 responses
                              49 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                              0 responses
                              109 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Working...