Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fahmida
    Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 54

    create the missing GFF

    Hi,

    This could be a trivial question. I have a de novo assembled genome and predcited proteins in fasta format. However, the accompanying GFF files are missing. What's the best way of creating the GFF file? Is it: blast proteins vs genome and then something like blast2gff using the blast result?

    Thanks.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    You have not said anything about the size of the genome you are working with but you could perhaps use MAKER (http://gmod.org/wiki/MAKER) which will make GFF3 files.

    Otherwise you can build the file yourself by parsing the information you have to fit the GFF3 format: http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3.shtml

    Comment

    • fahmida
      Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 54

      #3
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      You have not said anything about the size of the genome you are working with but you could perhaps use MAKER (http://gmod.org/wiki/MAKER) which will make GFF3 files.

      Otherwise you can build the file yourself by parsing the information you have to fit the GFF3 format: http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3.shtml
      Thanks for your reply GenoMax. Assembly size is ~400mb with ~250000 scaffolds(estimated Genome size ~480mb). Maker was was used to find the genes. Output of maker was the predicted transcripts, prtoteins and their corresponding gff file. However, unfortunately we only have the predicted proteins now nad lost other files. Hence instead of running the time consuming Maker pipeline again, I was wondering is their a way of mapping/aligning the proteins aganist the genome just to create the gff file?

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Originally posted by fahmida View Post
        Thanks for your reply GenoMax. Assembly size is ~400mb with ~250000 scaffolds(estimated Genome size ~480mb). Maker was was used to find the genes. Output of maker was the predicted transcripts, prtoteins and their corresponding gff file. However, unfortunately we only have the predicted proteins now nad lost other files. Hence instead of running the time consuming Maker pipeline again, I was wondering is their a way of mapping/aligning the proteins aganist the genome just to create the gff file?
        Out of curiosity how long was the original Maker run? Day(s)/week? It is a pity that you lost the predicted transcripts file otherwise this would have been easier.

        It may be more work than necessary to re-map the proteins back to the scaffolds and then parse the results to make the GFF file.
        Last edited by GenoMax; 09-11-2013, 05:05 PM.

        Comment

        • fahmida
          Member
          • Aug 2010
          • 54

          #5
          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          Out of curiosity how long was the original Maker run? Day(s)/week? It is a pity that you lost the predicted transcripts file otherwise this would have been easier.

          It may be more work than necessary to re-map the proteins back to the scaffolds and then parse the results to make the GFF file.
          Maker run took more than 2 weeks :-(

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            Yesterday, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...