Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • fahmida
    replied
    Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
    Out of curiosity how long was the original Maker run? Day(s)/week? It is a pity that you lost the predicted transcripts file otherwise this would have been easier.

    It may be more work than necessary to re-map the proteins back to the scaffolds and then parse the results to make the GFF file.
    Maker run took more than 2 weeks :-(

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by fahmida View Post
    Thanks for your reply GenoMax. Assembly size is ~400mb with ~250000 scaffolds(estimated Genome size ~480mb). Maker was was used to find the genes. Output of maker was the predicted transcripts, prtoteins and their corresponding gff file. However, unfortunately we only have the predicted proteins now nad lost other files. Hence instead of running the time consuming Maker pipeline again, I was wondering is their a way of mapping/aligning the proteins aganist the genome just to create the gff file?
    Out of curiosity how long was the original Maker run? Day(s)/week? It is a pity that you lost the predicted transcripts file otherwise this would have been easier.

    It may be more work than necessary to re-map the proteins back to the scaffolds and then parse the results to make the GFF file.
    Last edited by GenoMax; 09-11-2013, 05:05 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • fahmida
    replied
    Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
    You have not said anything about the size of the genome you are working with but you could perhaps use MAKER (http://gmod.org/wiki/MAKER) which will make GFF3 files.

    Otherwise you can build the file yourself by parsing the information you have to fit the GFF3 format: http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3.shtml
    Thanks for your reply GenoMax. Assembly size is ~400mb with ~250000 scaffolds(estimated Genome size ~480mb). Maker was was used to find the genes. Output of maker was the predicted transcripts, prtoteins and their corresponding gff file. However, unfortunately we only have the predicted proteins now nad lost other files. Hence instead of running the time consuming Maker pipeline again, I was wondering is their a way of mapping/aligning the proteins aganist the genome just to create the gff file?

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    You have not said anything about the size of the genome you are working with but you could perhaps use MAKER (http://gmod.org/wiki/MAKER) which will make GFF3 files.

    Otherwise you can build the file yourself by parsing the information you have to fit the GFF3 format: http://www.sequenceontology.org/gff3.shtml

    Leave a comment:


  • fahmida
    started a topic create the missing GFF

    create the missing GFF

    Hi,

    This could be a trivial question. I have a de novo assembled genome and predcited proteins in fasta format. However, the accompanying GFF files are missing. What's the best way of creating the GFF file? Is it: blast proteins vs genome and then something like blast2gff using the blast result?

    Thanks.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
38 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
44 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...