Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • agroster
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 13

    #1

    sff_extract: combining data from 454 Flx and Titanium data sets

    Hi,
    I am attempting to feed my 454 sequencing data sets into MIRA for assembly.
    Here is my data, all in .sff files:
    Flx unpaired reads (6 separate. sff files)
    Titanium unpaired reads (3 separate .sff files)
    Titanium paired-end reads (2 separate .sff files).

    I can extract to fasta and xml with the individual sets (unpaired-only and paired-only), but the MIRA assembler requires all data to be combined into a single data file.

    Does anyone know if this can be done with sff_extract? If so, can you explain to me how? The sff_extract webpage doesn't explain how to do this.
  • Jose Blanca
    Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 70

    #2
    Have you tried to extract them toghether? Just like:

    sff_extract 1.sff 2.sff

    Comment

    • agroster
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 13

      #3
      Thanks for your reply.

      Since one set of my data is paired-end, i believe i need to force sff_extract to split up the reads by inducing the -l command to look for the linker. Also, mira requests an addition of the paired-end library size and stdev info, but I wouldn't want that applied to the unpaired reads.

      I tried the cat command, but mira quit inexplicably when loading these files.

      Comment

      • maubp
        Peter (Biopython etc)
        • Jul 2009
        • 1544

        #4
        Originally posted by agroster View Post
        I tried the cat command, but mira quit inexplicably when loading these files.
        You can't just cat SFF files together - they have a complex header structure. It isn't really needed, but you can use the Roche tools (or 3rd party software) to combine SFF files, but they must all have the same number of flow cycles. In your case you have both FLX and Titanium runs so you can't do this.

        In any case, don't you want to give MIRA two separate sets of 454 data
        (the pairs and the unpaired reads)?

        Comment

        • agroster
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 13

          #5
          Originally posted by maubp View Post
          You can't just cat SFF files together - they have a complex header structure. It isn't really needed, but you can use the Roche tools (or 3rd party software) to combine SFF files, but they must all have the same number of flow cycles. In your case you have both FLX and Titanium runs so you can't do this.

          In any case, don't you want to give MIRA two separate sets of 454 data
          (the pairs and the unpaired reads)?
          I concatenated the separate .fasta, .qual, and .xml files that were generated post sff_extract for each type of data, not the .sff files before sff_extract.

          I DO want to give MIRA two separate sets of 454 data, but I don't know how to do this (since MIRA looks for only one file name). Does anyone know how to do this?

          Comment

          • maubp
            Peter (Biopython etc)
            • Jul 2009
            • 1544

            #6
            Originally posted by agroster View Post
            I concatenated the separate .fasta, .qual, and .xml files that were generated post sff_extract for each type of data, not the .sff files before sff_extract.
            Concatenating FASTA and QUAL files is fine, but I don't think you should concatenate XML files together. MIRA may cope, but I would expect any XML validator to reject such a file.
            Originally posted by agroster View Post
            I DO want to give MIRA two separate sets of 454 data, but I don't know how to do this (since MIRA looks for only one file name). Does anyone know how to do this?
            Have you read the "Walkthrough: combined unpaired and paired-end assembly of Brucella ceti" example in the MIRA manual?

            Comment

            • agroster
              Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 13

              #7
              Ok, i now see the issue - I need to append my subsequent sff extractions using the "-a" option. i.e. do three subsequent extractions, each appending to the previous. I'll see if this works.

              Comment

              • BaCh
                Member
                • May 2008
                • 81

                #8
                Originally posted by agroster View Post
                Ok, i now see the issue - I need to append my subsequent sff extractions using the "-a" option. i.e. do three subsequent extractions, each appending to the previous. I'll see if this works.
                Ah, I'm too late. Actually, two extractions are enough. First all the unpaired, then all paired with -a.

                Regards,
                Bastien

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • kinpict.com
                  Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by kinpict.com
                  The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
                  Today, 06:37 PM
                • SEQadmin2
                  16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by SEQadmin2





                  NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
                  10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
                0 responses
                27 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
                0 responses
                35 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
                2 responses
                56 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post kinpict.com  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                0 responses
                175 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...