Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Linnea
    Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 23

    bwa-mem paired reads problem

    Hi,

    I have aligned several re-sequenced individuals (Illumina HiSeq, paired-end with IS ~450bp) to a draft assembly, and when looking at the alignments in IGV, it seemed like almost all of them had their mate mapped on a different scaffold.

    I extracted some read pairs from the bam file and got this weired result:
    HWI-ST0866:1861D42ACXX:2:1313:18722:3523 pR1 scaffold37985 44312 60 100M scaffold54822 4963 0 AATAAATCTACCCCAGCCAGCCTAAAGCCACTCCCTCCTGTCCCATCACTTCATGCCTTTTCACAAAGTCCCTTCTCAGCCTTTTTGCAGCAGCAATCAG @BCFDDFFHHHHHJJIIIFIIJIIJGIGDIIIJJJJIJI<BGHIFJIJJIIJIIJJJJHIJJCE;CDHCC?CCEHFEFFFFE3>@CDDDDDB@DBDACCD NM:i:0 AS:i:100 XS:i:0
    HWI-ST0866:1861D42ACXX:2:1313:18722:3523 prR2 scaffold37985 44635 60 100M scaffold39009 30358 0 TGAAGGGTTAAAAACACATGGAGCCAGCATGTTCTGATCACTGAGAAACAACACTGTGAATCAGCACAGCAGCAAATGGGAGTGACAGGCACTGGAGATG CDDBACEECDECCBFFHFHHHIJIJIGIJIJJJJJJIHHIJJJJJIJIHDDHGIHIGIIGDJJIJJIIIIGIFJJJJJJJJJJJJJJHHHHGFFFFFCCC NM:i:1 AS:i:95 XS:i:0

    The first read in the pair is located on scaffold37985 and says it has its mate on scaffold54822, but when looking at the mate (second line) it's also located on scaffold37985, but reports to have a mate on scaffold39009!
    To me this seems so wrong, why can't they just form a proper pair, when they obviously have perfect matches close to each other on the same scaffold??? Am I missing something here?

    I ran bwa mem on 8 cores with otherwise default settings :
    bwa mem -t 8 reference readfile1.fastq readfile2.fastq >out.sam

    Any input on this would be much appreciated!
    Linnéa
  • ak352
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2013
    • 7

    #2
    Hi Linnea,
    Are you sure these are the only two mappings of this fragment? Could you post the results of

    grep -w "HWI-ST0866:1861D42ACXX:2:1313:18722:3523" file.bam
    Please answer my unsolved question - http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33740

    Comment

    • Linnea
      Member
      • Mar 2010
      • 23

      #3
      Thanks for your reply, actually that was the result from grep.. so no other mappings.

      However, I think I've just found the problem anyway.. When I checked if the fastq files were sorted properly, I used "head" and "less", and all the read names looked the same between the two files, but checking the line numbers for the pair above showed that they are in fact not on the same line. Turned out that while the beginning of the files were nicely sorted, the rest are not

      So no problem with bwa mem, only with my data!
      Now I only need to figure out how the h* that could happen...

      Sorry for posting!

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
      0 responses
      31 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...