Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • efoss
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 98

    #1

    bedtools coverage is inaccurate

    I am using bedtools to calculate coverage in an RNA-seq bam file. I get screwy readings when it encounters a gap where there are no reads. Rather than filling it in with zeros, it takes a value that is somewhere near the last read and uses that value to fill across the gap. For example, I just looked in IGV at a suspicious area in a bam file. IGV shows readcounts of 11, 11, 10, 10, 10, 9, 9, 9, 9, 1 and then a bunch of zeros. bedtools, on the other hand, lists the same numbers except that when it comes to the final 1, it says 7, and then the very long list of zeros is instead a very long list of 7s. Can anyone suggest a solution? The code I used is pasted below. (The last little thing where I pipe results to grep is to output only lines with non-zero read counts. Perhaps that's where I'm screwing up, but I don't think so.)

    Thanks.

    Eric



    genomeCoverageBed -d -split -ibam input.bam -g /home/efoss/gene_databases/dot_genome_files/g1k_v37.genome | grep -v -P "\S+\t\S+\t0" > output.txt
    Last edited by efoss; 09-19-2013, 11:48 AM.
  • BAMseek
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 124

    #2
    Hey Eric,

    My guess would be that if a read is split (such as spanning a splice junction), then that read may count towards the coverage for the entire interval, even the skipped bases. This link seems to talk about a similar issue. Looks like the solution in the post is to split those reads and try coverage again.

    (Edit: although looks like you did use the -split argument so maybe it is a different issue).

    Justin
    Last edited by BAMseek; 09-19-2013, 10:16 PM.

    Comment

    • kokonech
      Curious Character
      • Sep 2010
      • 13

      #3
      Hi!

      Make sure the BAM file is sorted by coordinate and the splitted alignment is defined by N cigar code (true for tophat by default).

      Also you might check some alternative ways to calculate coverage, for example using coverageBed and intersection with annotation file:

      Comment

      • efoss
        Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 98

        #4
        Hi kokonech,

        Thanks for the suggestion. I finally figured it out - there was a version of bedtools that had this as a known bug. I updated to the latest version and the problem went away.

        I bookmarked your site. It looks very helpful.

        Best wishes,

        Eric

        Comment

        • SylvainL
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2012
          • 180

          #5
          Hi efoss,

          can you tell us which version of bedtools you were using before?

          thanks

          Comment

          • efoss
            Member
            • Jul 2011
            • 98

            #6
            Hi SylvainL,

            I'm afraid I don't know which version it was. I think it was installed on our system in 2011. The one I'm using now is 2.17.0.

            Eric

            Comment

            • Nino
              Member
              • Mar 2013
              • 27

              #7
              Hey Guys,

              I am getting this weird error for my hg19.fa genome file.

              this is my command line argument:
              genomeCoverageBed -d -i Sample_23430_B14_T.sorted.dedup.rg.resorted.realigned.bed -g /pbtech_mounts/fdlab_store003/fdlab/genomes/human/hg19/indexes/bwa/genome/hg19.fa 1> Sample_23430_B14_T.sorted.dedup.rg.resorted.realigned.coverage

              and I get this error:
              Less than the req'd two fields were encountered in the genome file (/pbtech_mounts/fdlab_store003/fdlab/genomes/human/hg19/indexes/bwa/genome/hg19.fa) at line 1. Exiting.

              anyone know why, I can't seem to figure it out.

              Thanks!,
              Nino

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                Yesterday, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              24 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...