Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ThePresident
    replied
    Thank you for your input on this.

    I plotted a histogram of RPKM value and this is what I got:


    The median is about 36, but goes from 0 to 140K. So, I guess RPKM of 50 is pretty solid as you suggested, but what I do with low RPKM values? 1 or 2...? Where can I put a cutoff? Is it safe to say that under 10, it is a weak expression, 10-100 is "normal" expression and over 100 is high expression?

    Thanks again,
    TP

    Leave a comment:


  • swbarnes2
    replied
    if I have a RPKM value of 50, with what confidence can I say that that gene is indeed expressed, hence important for the cell in given conditions?
    Depends on the experiment. My lab throws in ERCC spike-ins into the preps, and if the spike-ins still show appropriately linear behavior at 1 RPKM, then we figure other genes at 1 RPKM are also okay, quantitatively.

    In my lab, we usually say that 0.5 RPKM or 1 RPKM are good cutoffs.

    An RPKM of 50 means that if you had 1 million reads in your experiment, and you are looking at a 1 kb transcript, you have 50 reads aligning to that transcript. If you have 5 million reads, that's 250 reads on that transcript. That's a pretty solid number, unless your prep has lots of PCR artifacts.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThePresident
    started a topic Biological implications of RPKM value

    Biological implications of RPKM value

    Hello everyone,

    Currently, I am going deep-through our expression database (bacterial RNA-seq data) in order to get the maximum information possible. I stumbled across very simple but still very important question: From what point can we say that a gene is fairly-well expressed in terms of RPKM value? For example, if I have a RPKM value of 50, with what confidence can I say that that gene is indeed expressed, hence important for the cell in given conditions?

    Would it be safe to compare to the mean expression of all genes, or perhaps compare to the expression of some HKG or even tRNA or rRNA?

    Thank you in advance for your opinion,

    TP

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Multiomics Techniques Advancing Disease Research
    by seqadmin


    New and advanced multiomics tools and technologies have opened new avenues of research and markedly enhanced various disciplines such as disease research and precision medicine1. The practice of merging diverse data from various ‘omes increasingly provides a more holistic understanding of biological systems. As Maddison Masaeli, Co-Founder and CEO at Deepcell, aptly noted, “You can't explain biology in its complex form with one modality.”

    A major leap in the field has
    ...
    02-08-2024, 06:33 AM
  • seqadmin
    The 3D Genome: New Technologies and Emerging Insights
    by seqadmin


    The study of three-dimensional (3D) genomics explores the spatial structure of genomes and their role in processes like gene expression and DNA replication. By employing innovative technologies, researchers can study these arrangements to discover their role in various biological processes. Scientists continue to find new ways in which the organization of DNA is involved in processes like development1 and disease2.

    Basic Organization and Structure
    Understanding...
    01-22-2024, 03:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Today, 08:52 AM
0 responses
11 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:57 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-14-2024, 09:19 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 02-12-2024, 03:37 PM
0 responses
422 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X