Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #16
    Just download the GTF annotation and use gtf2bed from bedops. That should keep the gene names (or some other useful identifier).

    Edit: The GTF annotation is available from the UCSC table browser, in case you weren't aware

    Comment

    • roll
      Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 38

      #17
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      Just download the GTF annotation and use gtf2bed from bedops. That should keep the gene names (or some other useful identifier).

      Edit: The GTF annotation is available from the UCSC table browser, in case you weren't aware
      Thanks Devon,
      Very helpful so far.
      I downloaded this annotation from ensembl. From biomart i simply left the filters sections empty and used the whole output as my list. This is right, no?

      PS. i just asked a question in biostar about flagstat and it was answered by you i think but i am not sure.

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #18
        If you're aligning against mm10, then don't use an annotation file from Ensembl (the chromosome names are different). That will cause no end of issue If you use the Ensembl annotation, just align against the genome that you can download from Ensembl (the Ensembl annotation is better anyway).

        Yeah, that was probably me, there's a large overlap between the people here and on biostars.

        Comment

        • roll
          Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 38

          #19
          I am using mm9. And I downloaded the bowtie index from their webpage. I had to change the chr names as ensembl uses the 1 instead of chr1. But i don't know whether just adding chr in front of the chromosomes names will sort it out. Should I do other changes in addition?

          Comment

          • dpryan
            Devon Ryan
            • Jul 2011
            • 3478

            #20
            That should be sufficient, just make sure that the annotation doesn't mention any chromosomes/contigs missing from the reference fasta file (I can't recall if that's the case or not).

            Comment

            • roll
              Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 38

              #21
              Do you mean manually checking if all chromosomes are there? i do not know what contigs are or how to check them.

              I think chrX and Y are missing in the gtf file. But how can I find information for missing chromosomes and complete it?

              Comment

              • dpryan
                Devon Ryan
                • Jul 2011
                • 3478

                #22
                No need to manually do that

                Just:
                Code:
                grep ">" reference.fa
                on the reference fasta file to get a list of the contigs and then:
                Code:
                 cat annotation.gtf | cut -f 1 | sort | uniq
                on the GTF or GFF file. They should be the same, possibly with a different order (and the output from the grep command will all start with ">", which you can ignore).

                Comment

                • roll
                  Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 38

                  #23
                  I did the check.
                  As you suggested the order is different.

                  The only differences are that
                  i have chrM in fa file and MN in the gtf file.
                  Also in the gtf file i have lots of 'NT_123456' type of entries which i do not what it is.

                  Do these differences cause any problem?

                  Comment

                  • dpryan
                    Devon Ryan
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 3478

                    #24
                    Originally posted by roll View Post
                    I did the check.
                    As you suggested the order is different.

                    The only differences are that
                    i have chrM in fa file and MN in the gtf file.
                    Also in the gtf file i have lots of 'NT_123456' type of entries which i do not what it is.

                    Do these differences cause any problem?
                    That will generally still cause issues with tophat. If you downloaded your bowtie indices from iGenomes (likely via a link on the bowtie webpage), then they came with an appropriate reference annotation file. Just use that one.

                    Comment

                    • roll
                      Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 38

                      #25
                      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
                      Assuming that you're using the mm10 reference, you can download the repeatmasker output here (mm9 is here). The general idea is to extract the type of feature(s) you want from the repeatmasker .out file and convert that to bed format and use "bedtools intersect ..." to get a count of how many reads align there. There are many other ways to do this, but that should work.

                      In fact, a more straight-forward way might be simply to run cufflinks on your alignments and then intersect the novel transcripts it finds with the repeatmasker output file. That might end up being easier.
                      from the repeat list, i am trying to use the ones on forward strand. do you know how to extract this from the .out file?
                      The column headers are like
                      SW perc perc perc query position in query matching repeat position in repeat
                      score div. del. ins. sequence begin end (left) repeat class/family begin end (left) ID

                      687 17.4 0.0 0.0 chr1 3000002 3000156 (194195276) C L1_Mur2 LINE/L1 (4310) 1567 1413 1
                      917 21.4 11.4 4.5 chr1 3000238 3000733 (194194699) C L1_Mur2 LINE/L1 (4488) 1389 913 1
                      215 3.1 0.0 3.0 chr1 3000734 3000766 (194194666) + (TTTG)n Simple_repeat 2 33 (0) 2

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                        ...
                        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                        by SEQadmin2


                        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                        ...
                        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                      0 responses
                      12 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                      0 responses
                      20 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                      0 responses
                      19 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                      0 responses
                      27 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...