Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • warrenemmett
    Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 23

    Average coverage for miRNAseq analysis for mouse/human ?

    Hi there,

    I recently got asked to take a look at some miRNA data from mouse, 6 samples with 1 million reads each off a Miseq.

    I am mostly interested in quantification and presence of known miRNA. When I run this through mirdeep2 I get very few hits to mature mirna, maybe 40 with 35+ having only a single read hit out of 6 samples.

    Almost none of the reads align to the mm9 genome, roughly 99% fail to align in each sample, I have checked the Qc and there is plenty of Truseq adapter even some PCR primer in some samples but others seem reasonably clean. I used cutadapt to remove all adapter sequence I could but there was no improvement in overall alignment figures.

    Firstly, is 1 million reads (after filtering and removing adapters its more like 600k) enough for a miRNA analysis on mouse?

    Secondly, is there any reason I'm getting such low alignment figures ? Regardless of how aggressively I trim the data it does not improve alignment to the genome or alignment to miRBase. Is there something I'm missing or is it likely something went wrong with sequencing or library prep?

    Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
    by SEQadmin2



    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
    ...
    Yesterday, 11:10 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
0 responses
10 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...