Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sindrle
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 266

    #1

    No result with DESeq2, but with Cuffdiff 2.1.1

    I have a question, I get no significantly changed genes running DESeq2. I have two groups at two time points (paired) and ran DEseq2 v1.2. DESeq2 test the difference between groups, disregarding time point, difference between time points disregarding groups & finally if one group had another effect between the two timepoints than the other.

    I have also used Cuffdiff 2.1.1 testing difference between groups, disregarding time point & difference between time points disregarding groups (Cuffdiff cannot handle the last test).

    Cuffdiff found over 1000 diff exp. genes and running GAGE it all made biological sense. So why cant I find anything with DEseq2?
  • sindrle
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 266

    #2
    I haw tweeked abit and the results now looks ok, but differing still from cuffdiff. My study design is however one that cuffdiff cannot handle..

    Comment

    • Simon Anders
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 995

      #3
      If you told us what you actually did, we might be able to tell you whether it is correct. So, how have you called DESeq2?

      Comment

      • sindrle
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2013
        • 266

        #4
        Hi!
        With this run I get some genes sig. changed and I guess they are more to be trusted than Cuffdiff results due to correct design?
        I will see if EdgeR also gives the same results.

        library(DESeq2);
        library(GenomicFeatures);
        library(htSeqTools);
        sampleFiles <- list.files(path="/Volumes/timemachine/HTseq_DEseq2",pattern="*.txt");
        sort(sampleFiles,decreasing=TRUE);
        status <- factor(c(rep("Diabetic",22), rep("Healthy",26)), levels=c("Diabetic","Healthy"));
        timepoints = as.factor(c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2));
        patients <- factor(c(88,87,86,83,82,81,75,72,71,70,13,08,01,88,87,86,83,82,81,75,72,71,70,13,08,01,79,77,76,73,67,62,61,55,53,21,04,79,77,76,73,67,62,61,55,53,21,04));
        sampleTable <- data.frame(sampleName = sampleFiles, fileName = sampleFiles, status=status, timepoints=timepoints, patients=patients);
        directory <- c("/Volumes/timemachine/HTseq_DEseq2/");
        des <- formula(~patients + timepoints*status);
        ddsHTSeq <- DESeqDataSetFromHTSeqCount(sampleTable = sampleTable, directory = directory, design= des);
        ddsHTSeq;
        dds <- estimateSizeFactors(ddsHTSeq);
        dds <- estimateDispersions(dds);
        dds <- nbinomWaldTest(dds, maxit = 5000)
        resultsNames(dds);
        statusResults <- results(dds, "status_Healthy_vs_Diabetic");
        timepointsResults <- results(dds, "timepoints_2_vs_1");
        statusTreatmentResults <- results(dds, "timepoints2.statusHealthy");
        write.csv(as.data.frame(statusResults),file="/Volumes/timemachine/HTseq_DEseq2/1_Results/statusResults.csv");
        write.csv(as.data.frame(timepointsResults),file="/Volumes/timemachine/HTseq_DEseq2/1_Results/timepointsResults.csv");
        write.csv(as.data.frame(statusTreatmentResults),file="/Volumes/timemachine/HTseq_DEseq2/1_Results/statusTreatmentResults.csv");
        plotDispEsts(dds)
        Last edited by sindrle; 10-21-2013, 12:30 AM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...