Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • meher
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 54

    #1

    Multi-sample vs Single sample SNP calling for Linkage analysis

    Hi,

    We have performed SNP calling for 8 individuals with multi-sample approach and also individual SNP calling using GATK. Below are the few output lines from the outputs.

    Multisample SNP calling output:

    #CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT BC210 BC212 BC214 BC217 BC219 BC226 BC229 BC230
    chr1 356 . G T 179.43 . AC=7;AF=0.583;AN=12;BaseQRankSum=-0.787;DP=1455;Dels=0.00;FS=0.000;HaplotypeScore=1.4705;MLEAC=8;MLEAF=0.667;MQ=2.17;MQ0=1408;MQRankSum=-1.740;QD=0.23;ReadPosRankSum=2.837 GT:ADP:GQ:PL 0/1:62,121:184:17:19,0,17
    ./. 0/0:81,94:176:3:0,3,24 1/1:45,138:181:6:54,6,0 1/1:74,108:182:9:84,9,0 ./.
    1/1:46,141:183:6:61,6,0 0/0:55,109:165:3:0,3,23
    chr1 389 . T G 178.50 . AC=6;AF=0.375;AN=16;BaseQRankSum=-0.775;DP=202;Dels=0.00;FS=26.344;HaplotypeScore=0.7725;MLEAC=6;MLEAF=0.375;MQ=12.37;MQ0=75;MQRankSum=-4.220;QD=1.08;ReadPosRankSum=0.073 GT:ADP:GQ:PL 0/1:21,21:42:35:35,0,116
    0/0:11,7:18:9:0,9,68 0/1:13,5:18:18:18,0,58 0/1:8,14:21:39:39,0,59 0/1:16,16:32:59:66,0,59 0/1:14,7:20:43:43,0,85 0/1:10,20:29:19:21,0,19 0/0:9,9:18:6:0,6,44


    Output from Individual SNP calling but merged into a single VCF file:

    #CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT BC210 BC212 BC214 BC217 BC219 BC226 BC229 BC230
    chr1 356 . G T 45.01 . AC=4;AF=1.00;AN=4;DP=388;Dels=0.00;FS=0.000;HaplotypeScore=0.0000;MLEAC=2;MLEAF=1.00;MQ0=190;MQ=2.89;QD=0.17;SF=1,5 GT:GQP:PL:AD . . . . 1/1:9:182:84,9,0:84,100 . 1/1:6:188:61,6,0:49,144 .
    chr1 389 . T G 37.77 . AC=1;AF=0.500;AN=2;BaseQRankSum=-0.189;DP=33;Dels=0.00;FS=3.979;HaplotypeScore=2.9800;MLEAC=1;MLEAF=0.500;MQ0=12;MQ=12.44;MQRankSum=-1.474;QD=1.14;ReadPosRankSum=-0.794;SF=5 GT:GQP:PL:AD . .
    . . 0/1:59:32:66,0,59:16,16 . . .


    As we can see that multisample SNP calling output has genotypes for most of the samples whereas the output from single sample SNP calling shows "." for some individuals.

    How should we interpret both the outputs. Is the output from single sample SNP calling more specific than multisample SNP calling or is it viceversa?

    I would like to use these genotypes to convert into ped format and perform linkage analysis. Could someone suggest which of these outputs should be used to do so.

    Thanks in advance!!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
37 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
72 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...