Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • adrian
    Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 90

    #1

    BWA index

    Dear group,

    Previously I used index like the following on human genome:

    bwa index -a bwtsw -c Hsapiens37.fasta

    I ran the subsequent analysis steps and compared the end result with others where they just used

    bwa index Hsapiens37.fasta
    and carried out end analysis resulting in .sam file.


    now when i compare results from -a bwtsw option to no parameter indexing (2nd option), majority of reads are aligned reversed etc.

    one should use this option or not?
    what happns using -a bwtsw and -c and what happens if I dont.

    could some one help me here. thanks
    Adrian
  • Chipper
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 323

    #2
    Hi, not sure I understand your question but -c is the option you use if you have SOLiD colorspace reads.

    Comment

    • adrian
      Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 90

      #3
      Thank you! i got it!
      Last edited by adrian; 01-22-2010, 08:53 PM.

      Comment

      • adrian
        Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 90

        #4
        how much time does it normally take to index 49 fasta format chromosomes (including 24 human chrs + other contigs), If I do the following:

        $ bwa index Hsapiens37.fasta

        I have been running this for last 24 hours and it is till on...

        $ bwa index Hsapiens37.fasta
        [bwa_index] Pack FASTA... 138.06 sec
        [bwa_index] Reverse the packed sequence... 37.73 sec
        [bwa_index] Construct BWT for the packed sequence...

        according to BWA homepage any genome that is over 4GB is cannot be index by BWA.
        the genome size I am trying to index is 5.3GB. This includes all chromosomes and other 'chrN_random' and chr6 haplotypes. All these in one file is over 5 GB. Has any one successfully tried to index these using BWA.
        thanks
        Last edited by adrian; 01-23-2010, 08:33 AM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...