I am looking for a way to quantify all of the peak density/abundance of ChIP signal for a POL II ChIP-seq experiment in every refseq gene body that doesn't involve normalization for gene size and can be a variable span accommodate each gene from TSS to TTS. The only software I know that quantifies abundance requires you to either enter a fixed span for each genomic region or normalizes for gene length. Thank you.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
-
Have a look at the Homer software:
"Measuring Gene Expression in Exons vs. Gene Bodies.
Depending on the type of sequencing you are analyzing, you will want to quantify RNA from different parts of the gene. The "-count [...]" option controls which regions of the gene are used for analysis (use like "-count exons" or "-count genes"). The options below only pertain to 'rna' or a custom GTF file:
exons - Counts tags in exons only. Use this for most applications of RNA-Seq, such as polyA-RNA-seq or other techniques that aim to measure mRNA.
cds - Counts tags in coding regions only. This could be useful for quantifying ribosome coverage on coding sequences with techniques such as Ribo-Seq
introns - Counts tags on introns only.
5utr or 3utr - Count tags on 5' UTR and 3' UTR regions, respectively.
genes (default) - Counts tags on the full gene body (TSS to TTS). This is useful for GRO-Seq where we expect coverage across the entire transcript. Can also be used to quantify H3K36me3 or PolII ChIP-Seq."
-
-
Or you may provide a bed file containing all the gene information from TSS to TSSOriginally posted by polvo View PostI am looking for a way to quantify all of the peak density/abundance of ChIP signal for a POL II ChIP-seq experiment in every refseq gene body that doesn't involve normalization for gene size and can be a variable span accommodate each gene from TSS to TTS. The only software I know that quantifies abundance requires you to either enter a fixed span for each genomic region or normalizes for gene length. Thank you.
and use coverageBed from bedtools http://bedtools.readthedocs.org/en/l.../coverage.html
Comment
-
-
You could use UniPeak and annotate with known genes, as done in this paper: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/14/720/abstract
But you're unlikely to find pol II very far into gene bodies anyway, unless you used the antibody for the serine 2-phosphorylated form. So if you start from entire gene-body annotations you may have problems.Last edited by jwfoley; 11-06-2013, 04:24 PM.
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...-
Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 11:10 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...-
Channel: Articles
07-08-2026, 05:17 AM -
-
by GATTACATLove this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
-
Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 10:04 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
0 responses
7 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
0 responses
12 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
|
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
|
Comment