Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jason_ARGONAUTE
    Member
    • Aug 2013
    • 14

    DESeq NB test for samples without biological replicates

    Hi guys,

    I hv encountered problems performing negative binomial test for samples without replicates while control group has replicates with DESeq.

    Experimental design:
    conduct the experiment under three conditions with common control: A B C (same samples treated at 3 distinct levels -- 50%, 80%, 95%)
    Condition A has two biological replicates, Condition B and C have no biological replicates, Control group has two biological replicates.
    noted as A_1, A_2, B, C, Ctrl_1, Ctrl_2
    Pipeline of transcriptomic RNA-seq(paired-end):
    map clean reads to ref genome using Tophat -> get the raw counts using SAMtools and HTSeq -> normalized the raw counts matrix using DESeq -> negative binomial test using DESeq

    # Do stats based on a negative binomial distribution from Simon's vignette
    With replicates:
    cds = estimateDispersions(cds)
    results = nbinomTest(cds, "condition", "control")
    Without replicates:
    cds = estimateDispersions(cds, method = "blind")
    results = nbinomTest(cds, "condition", "control")

    So, my confusion goes for a reasonable strategy to conduct NB test without replicates:
    I have two replicates of control group(Ctrl1,Ctrl2) while no replicates for conditon B and conditon C, which way to perform a negative binomial test fits best for this case?
    My current strategy is performing NB test between Ctrl1 and B/C(ignore Ctrl2).
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    You'll be better off using the control replicates than if you were to use the "blind" method.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...