Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ragowthaman
    Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 12

    a viewer for RNAseq data

    Hi All,
    We have done a RNAseq and aligned the reads against the genome (there is no introns in here) using bowtie. I also have BAM/SAM output files. I am looking for a viewer to view the alignment.

    I tried MapView. Works good. But, there is no way to display the genome annotation information

    others like signalmap, artemis display only the coverage but not the reads themselves. ANy suggestion. I tried lookseq. I have problem setting that up.

    Gowtham
  • jnfass
    Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 88

    #2
    IGV (integrated genomics viewer, from Broad) will display the read alignments, as well as variant positions (without relying on samtools for variant calling) from a bam file ...

    Comment

    • jnfass
      Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 88

      #3
      ... as well as annotation from bed or other file formats (gff, I think?) ... and it displays coverage at certain zoom levels automatically, and you can run a 'count' tool within 'igvtools' that will give you a file that allows you to view (binned) coverage at all zoom levels.

      Comment

      • mgogol
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2008
        • 197

        #4
        IGV is good. UCSC genome browser will also work directly with BAM files, but it might not be what you're after.

        Comment

        • jnfass
          Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 88

          #5
          re: IGV versus UCSCGB ... with IGV it's a snap to set up and run with your own (non-standard) genome. Also, you can view all "chromosomes" (or scaffolds) of your genome at the same time, lined up .. something you can't do with UCSC unless you specifically create a "fake-o-some" fasta file. On the other hand, UCSCGB has table queries, and can link with Galaxy for complicated feature counting / overlap / etc. analysis ...

          pro's and con's ...

          Comment

          • ragowthaman
            Member
            • Nov 2009
            • 12

            #6
            Hi both,
            Thanks for the quick replies. Does the Broad institute has two such tools? GenomeView and Integrated Genome View. It seems IGV needs some conversions.....while at it, i tried genomeview. It worked too. May be IGV is an improved version of Genomeview.

            I will update how my IGV goes. Thanks again.

            Comment

            • jnfass
              Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 88

              #7
              ... hadn't heard of genomeview. Must be a different group within Broad? In any case, if you try and compare both, please let us (here on the forum) know what you think.

              Comment

              • klaas.vandepoele
                Junior Member
                • Jan 2011
                • 6

                #8
                Reference GenomeView

                fyi, GenomeView is developed by Thomas Abeel (Ghent University, BE / Broad).
                For more info, check http://genomeview.org/

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  Yesterday, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                9 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                31 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...