[mapping_count_single] 18, 26, 32, 44
[match_data2mapping] 12870 pairs are added afterwards.
[match_data2mapping] (91894, 92757) reads are moved to meet paired-end requirement.
[match_data2mapping] quality counts of the first reads: (779, 91115); second reads (859, 91898)
[cal_insert_size] 6105211 read pairs counted. insert size: 415.715158 +/- 24.602505
[maq_make_aln_candidate] 1300881 candidates added
[maq_indel_pe] 1300881 candidates for alignment
[maq_indel_pe] CPU time: 166.310 sec
[match_data2mapping] 27944010 out of 31327320 raw reads are mapped with 27372224 in pairs.
-- (total, isPE, mapped, paired) = (31327320, 1, 27944010, 27372224)
Hi guys, I was wondering how I would go about interpretting the quality count for the reads. The two numbers appear to be too high to be an average for read quality but too low to be the sum of all qualities. Thanks!
[match_data2mapping] 12870 pairs are added afterwards.
[match_data2mapping] (91894, 92757) reads are moved to meet paired-end requirement.
[match_data2mapping] quality counts of the first reads: (779, 91115); second reads (859, 91898)
[cal_insert_size] 6105211 read pairs counted. insert size: 415.715158 +/- 24.602505
[maq_make_aln_candidate] 1300881 candidates added
[maq_indel_pe] 1300881 candidates for alignment
[maq_indel_pe] CPU time: 166.310 sec
[match_data2mapping] 27944010 out of 31327320 raw reads are mapped with 27372224 in pairs.
-- (total, isPE, mapped, paired) = (31327320, 1, 27944010, 27372224)
Hi guys, I was wondering how I would go about interpretting the quality count for the reads. The two numbers appear to be too high to be an average for read quality but too low to be the sum of all qualities. Thanks!
