Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MissDona
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 17

    confused about the pileup data

    hi all,
    I'm quite confused with the samtools mpileup result of some reads, such as:
    ,..^+,^>,
    .+2CT^>.^!,
    .*.*^>,
    what does ">", "<", "^+", "^>", "*" means?
    thanks alot!
  • sBeier
    Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 41

    #2
    It looks a bit as if you opened the binary version of the result file (bcf). If so, convert it to vcf using the vcftools. If this is not the case, could you post some lines of the result file? Without context it is hard to guess.

    Comment

    • MissDona
      Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 17

      #3
      I think I've figured out most of them with http://www.biostars.org/p/8566/,
      but yet cannot figure out the differenct between "^]." and "^!."

      Comment

      • MissDona
        Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 17

        #4
        thanks sBeier,
        but this is not bcf file, this is the fifth column(that is, the read list column of samtools mpileup result)
        with a few full lines here:
        1 10086 A 16 ..........,,..., ?EBCCB*BCB?C9B@< F4>>>>"!>>!>>+-!
        1 10087 A 16 ..........,,..., ?EEDF93<DD=@@<D4 F4>>>>"!>>!>>+-!
        1 10088 C 16 ..........,,..., DEGFFB>ACFEFADEF F4>>>>"!>>!>>+-!

        Comment

        • MissDona
          Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 17

          #5
          I think I figured out them all, the content in the parentheses of "^()" means the mapping quality of the read.

          Comment

          • sBeier
            Member
            • Jan 2013
            • 41

            #6
            Usually in the comment lines at the beginning of VCF, all of the columns are explained. Because you can have specific columns for many tools that generate VCFs

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            22 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            55 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...