Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • yasu
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 10

    #1

    tophat running problem

    Hi all,

    I'm trying to run mRNA-seq for human by tophat (v1.0.12).
    I succeeded to get proper output file in the preliminary dataset (first 100K reads from each .fq file). But I failed to get proper output in the real dataset (each contains ~17M reads).

    I would appreciate any help you could give me with this.

    Thanks in advance.

    -Yasu

    ### preliminary_test ###

    $ tophat -r 10 -p 8 -o tophat_hg19_test hg19 s_1_1.head4000000.fq,s_6_1.head4000000.fq,s_7_1.head4000000.fq s_1_2.head4000000.fq,s_6_2.head4000000.fq,s_7_2.head4000000.fq

    [Mon Feb 8 13:31:03 2010] Beginning TopHat run (v1.0.12)
    -----------------------------------------------
    [Mon Feb 8 13:31:03 2010] Preparing output location tophat_hg19_test/
    [Mon Feb 8 13:31:03 2010] Checking for Bowtie index files
    [Mon Feb 8 13:31:03 2010] Checking for reference FASTA file
    [Mon Feb 8 13:31:03 2010] Checking for Bowtie
    Bowtie version: 0.11.3.0
    [Mon Feb 8 13:31:03 2010] Checking reads
    seed length: 43bp
    format: fastq
    quality scale: --phred33-quals
    [Mon Feb 8 13:31:51 2010] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie
    [Mon Feb 8 13:34:24 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 13:34:59 2010] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie
    [Mon Feb 8 13:37:30 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 13:38:04 2010] Searching for junctions via segment mapping
    [Mon Feb 8 13:44:59 2010] Retrieving sequences for splices
    [Mon Feb 8 13:46:42 2010] Indexing splices
    [Mon Feb 8 13:47:58 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie
    [Mon Feb 8 13:48:47 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 13:49:26 2010] Mapping reads against segment_juncs with Bowtie
    [Mon Feb 8 13:50:15 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 13:50:52 2010] Reporting output tracks
    -----------------------------------------------
    Run complete [00:33:58 elapsed]


    ### real_data ###

    tophat -r 10 -p 8 -o tophat_hg19 hg19 s_1_1.fq,s_6_1.fq,s_7_1.fq s_1_2.fq,s_6_2.fq,s_7_2.fq

    [Mon Feb 8 14:24:47 2010] Beginning TopHat run (v1.0.12)
    -----------------------------------------------
    [Mon Feb 8 14:24:47 2010] Preparing output location tophat_hg19/
    [Mon Feb 8 14:24:47 2010] Checking for Bowtie index files
    [Mon Feb 8 14:24:47 2010] Checking for reference FASTA file
    [Mon Feb 8 14:24:47 2010] Checking for Bowtie
    Bowtie version: 0.11.3.0
    [Mon Feb 8 14:24:47 2010] Checking reads
    seed length: 43bp
    format: fastq
    quality scale: --phred33-quals
    [Mon Feb 8 14:39:23 2010] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie
    [Mon Feb 8 15:24:40 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 15:35:38 2010] Mapping reads against hg19 with Bowtie
    [Mon Feb 8 16:18:44 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 16:18:44 2010] Searching for junctions via segment mapping
    Warning: junction database is empty!
    [Mon Feb 8 18:01:42 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 18:11:38 2010] Joining segment hits
    [Mon Feb 8 18:11:38 2010] Reporting output tracks
    [FAILED]
    Error: Report generation failed with err = 1
    Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/bin/tophat", line 1518, in ?
    sys.exit(main())
    File "/bin/tophat", line 1490, in main
    params.gff_annotation)
    File "/bin/tophat", line 936, in compile_reports
    exit(1)
    TypeError: 'str' object is not callable
  • yasu
    Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 10

    #2
    I add the report.log file from real_data (failed one).

    ### Real_data (reports.log) ###

    tophat_reports v1.0.12
    ---------------------------------------
    Error: cannot open map file for reading

    #####################

    Comparing with the run.log files from preliminary_test (succeeded one) and from real_data (failed one), "/bin/segment_juncs" doesn't work well.

    Can somebody give me any help?

    Thanks,

    -Yasu

    Comment

    • Cole Trapnell
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 213

      #3
      The fact that TopHat thinks the seed length is 43bp is concerning. The default is 25, and it shouldn't be different unless you specified --segment-length, which you didn't. TopHat currently requires that FASTQ files have records where all of the nucleotides for each read appear on a single line. Same goes for the quality strings - all the quality characters need to be on one line. This is a limitation I haven't had time to fix yet. Can you verify that your FASTQ file is formatted this way?

      Comment

      • yasu
        Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 10

        #4
        Thanks for your kind help!!

        My fastq file is something like this. I omitted the sequence+position id from the line after "+". Does this make the things bad?

        -Yasu

        ###########
        @HWI-EAS368:1:1:9:316#0/1
        CTGGATGATAACATTCCAGAAGATGACTCAGGTGTCCCCACCC
        +
        BB66AB9ACBB@BCBAAA><BBBAAB?BBB@@@BA?B@BB@AB
        @HWI-EAS368:1:1:9:424#0/1
        CTCCCTGCCAGATATCGAGGAGGTGAAAGACCAGAGCAGGAAC
        +
        BCBBB>?>@CBABBB;A877??.:<<B@;@@?=>?A>?6AAA?
        @HWI-EAS368:1:1:9:1060#0/1
        TGGATGGTTCAGGATAATCACCTGAGCAGTGAAGCCAGCTGCT
        +
        BBBBB=?@BBB?=@A9AA@CAA><<@:5>7?=A?A@?=A???@
        @HWI-EAS368:1:1:9:410#0/1
        CGGAGGCGGAGGCTTGGGTGCGTTCAAGATTCAGCTTCACCCG
        +
        AA9AAA=:A7'=7=?4+366=AA@:A>999B:=2,=>1014>7
        @HWI-EAS368:1:1:9:807#0/1
        CGAACATTTCTGGCCCCCAAGTGTCAGCCCATTCACGTAAAAA
        +
        BBBBBBC@@<:;6BC>:@2<B=BBB@7;BB=:C@799:BBB?%
        @HWI-EAS368:1:1:9:405#0/1
        TGTAAAGCCTGAAACAGCTGCCTGTGTGGGACTGAGATGCAGG
        +
        ?=>B=AA@AB@AAB?88>@@@BB>?B>A<=>?A81<-<@@B@@

        Comment

        • yasu
          Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 10

          #5
          I added the '--segment-length 25', but the comment is still as follows;

          [Tue Feb 9 16:47:40 2010] Checking reads
          seed length: 43bp
          format: fastq
          quality scale: --phred33-quals

          Did I go some wrong way?

          -Yasu

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2




            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          33 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          72 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          48 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...