Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • metheuse
    Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 84

    #1

    Different DESeq2 results (both FC and pvalue) by changing col/row orders in input

    I'm getting different p-values and FCs from DESeq2 (v1.34.0) by simply changing the order of the columns in the count table. I can't understand why. I made sure the cols of count table match the rows of colData in both.

    The differences in this dataset are small ([-0.003, 0.003] for p-value, and [-0.002, 0.001] for FC). But in some other datasets, the difference of log2FC can be up to 0.8 (and the baseMean for that gene is 300), which is concerning.

    I tried setting `betaPrior = FALSE` but still got the difference.

    Column `Genotype` in colData is the only tested variable in the model. It contains `WT` and `Mutant` as factors, with `WT` as the 1st level.

    Actually if I change column `Genotype` to character type and rerun DESeq2 (so DESeq2 will convert them to factors with the warning message), I get the same results independent of the col/row orders in the input. So it seems the difference is somehow related to the factorization of the columns in colData, but I don't know why, and which results I should trust.



    Code:
    data <- readRDS('data.rds')
    
    dds1 <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = data[['counts']], colData = data[['colData']], design = ~ Genotype)
    dds1 <- dds1[rowSums(counts(dds1)) > 1, ]
    dds1 <- DESeq(dds1, betaPrior = TRUE)
    res1 <- as.data.frame(results(dds1, contrast = list("GenotypeMutant","GenotypeWT")))
    
    # only reorder the inputs, but the columns of counts still match the rows of colData:
    dds2 <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = data[['counts']][,c(4:6,1:3)], colData = data[['colData']][c(4:6,1:3),], design = ~ Genotype)
    dds2 <- dds2[rowSums(counts(dds2)) > 1, ]
    dds2 <- DESeq(dds2, betaPrior = TRUE)
    res2 <- as.data.frame(results(dds2, contrast = list("GenotypeMutant","GenotypeWT")))
    
    res1['ENSMUSG00000069515',]
    res2['ENSMUSG00000069515',]


    Code:
    baseMean log2FoldChange lfcSE stat pvalue
    ENSMUSG00000069515 3043.921 1.142537 0.09271227 12.32347 6.771949e-35
    padj
    ENSMUSG00000069515 4.605602e-31
    
    
    baseMean log2FoldChange lfcSE stat pvalue
    ENSMUSG00000069515 3043.921 1.142512 0.09272373 12.32168 6.923947e-35
    padj
    ENSMUSG00000069515 4.708976e-31

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...