Does anyone know where I can find an Illumina spike-in data set? We're trying to benchmark some programs, but haven't been able to find any available.
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Pseudo simulated spike-in datasets for chIP-seq
I've posted some pseudo simulated spike-in data sets to http://bioserver.hci.utah.edu/Supple...aperInfo/2008/ under Nix_EmpricalMethods. Basically, localized random reads are added to input sequencing data. Keys are provided so you can calculate TPRs and FDRs.
This is from a paper we just submitted:
Spike-in Data Set Generation
An application was developed to simulate single binding site chIP regions. It works by randomly selecting center positions from a genome. These are expanded to a maximum defined size (500bp) and then filtered to remove regions with a RepeatMasker base content of greater than 0.2 and a fraction of non GATC bases greater than 0.5. For each remaining region, random fragments are generated about each center position from 150 to 500bp in size. From each simulated fragment, each end is taken as a read and each base in the read mutated according to the published per cycle error frequency[12]. Reads are then aligned to the genome.
For the human spike-in dataset, 1000 regions with 1000 simulated chIP fragments were selected producing 2000 reads each. These were mapped to hg17 using the ELAND Extended aligner from Solexa. Only those regions with greater than 1000 mapped reads were chosen for use in generating the spike-in set. 60 groups containing 30 spike-in regions were created. For each of the groups, from 2 to 60 reads were randomly drawn from each of the 30 residing spike-in regions. These represent 900 spike-in regions containing 2 to 60 reads, 27,900 total. To create the actual spike-in datasets, Johnson et.al.’s control input data was combine, randomized and split in thirds, 1,698,713 reads each. To one of the thirds, the reads from the 900 spike-in regions were added. This represents the simulated chIP data, the other two simulated input data sets.
In a similar fashion, the mouse spike-in dataset was generated. Reads from 1000 regions with 1000 fragments were mapped to mm8. Regions with greater than 500 mapped reads were used to derive 87 groups, each with 10 regions, 870 total containing 1 to 87 randomly drawn reads, 38,280 total. To generate a larger simulated input dataset, data from Mikkelsen et. al. that showed little to no significant enrichment (ES.H3, ES.K9, ES.RPol, ESHyb.K9, MEF.K9, NP.K9, NP.K27, and NP.K36) were pooled along with their actual whole cell extract input data (ES.WCE, MEF.WCE, and NP.WCE), randomized, and split in thirds, 16,383,950 reads each.
You will need to combine the appropriate files to generate datasets that suit your purposes. There are a bunch of utilities at USeq (http://useq.sourceforge.net/ ) for manipulating the binary bar files if you'd rather go that route instead of using the txt files. Good luck! I'm glad you're going to bench mark your methods. -cheers, David
Comment
-
-
spikin-in data from RNA-Seq
Hi,
This is my first post. First want to say hi to everyone.
I wonder whether anyone knows of any RNA-Seq spike-in datasets publicly available (like latin-square data or golden spike from the affy platform).
Thanks,
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...-
Channel: Articles
07-09-2026, 11:10 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...-
Channel: Articles
07-08-2026, 05:17 AM -
-
by GATTACATLove this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
-
Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
|
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
|
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
0 responses
22 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
0 responses
34 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
Comment