Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aldrinyim
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 5

    #1

    BWA index error

    Dear all,

    I never met this problem before not until I used a multiple fasta file (around 30) with each fasta sequence around 2000 to 3000 bp, is it not applicable to use short reads to map to fasta sequence of such kind?

    the problem is

    [bwa_index] Pack FASTA... 0.00 sec
    [bwa_index] Reverse the packed sequence... 0.00 sec
    [bwa_index] Construct BWT for the packed sequence...
    [BWTIncConstructFromPacked] 10 iterations done. 18660 characters processed.
    [BWTIncConstructFromPacked] 20 iterations done. 28804 characters processed.
    [BWTIncConstructFromPacked] 30 iterations done. 32948 characters processed.
    BWTIncSetBuildSizeAndTextAddr(): Not enough space allocated to continue construction!

    Would anyone help?
  • aldrinyim
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 5

    #2
    Oh hi everyone I just test the multiple fasta file and found that if we want an effective indexing of the fasta file, at least each fasta sequence should be >110000bp.

    The program now works, thanks everyone.

    Comment

    • nilshomer
      Nils Homer
      • Nov 2008
      • 1283

      #3
      Originally posted by aldrinyim View Post
      Oh hi everyone I just test the multiple fasta file and found that if we want an effective indexing of the fasta file, at least each fasta sequence should be >110000bp.

      The program now works, thanks everyone.
      There are two algorithms to create indexes, one for short genomes/references, and one for long genomes/references. The default is the algorithm for long references so you have to specify "-a is" to run the algorithm for the short reference.

      Comment

      • aldrinyim
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 5

        #4
        Thanks nilshomer for reminding me of that, because i wrote a few scripts for BWA, I mistakenly used the script using dbwtsw for the short genome.

        The problem should be fixed now!

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...