Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • neant
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 1

    #1

    Gene ontology clustering

    Hello, I am new to GO analysis and I am a little bit confused.

    I have some mass spec data. The output data is a list of gene names (UNIPROT) and a value for the control and experimental. I have normalized all data to the control for each protein in the study. After taking log2, I have a +/- list of expression data for all proteins in my study for the three experimental conditions.

    I want to see what genes show up in what major cellular/biochemical/disease categories and visual their enrichment level. So basically if say 10 different genes are known to be involved in a specific disease phenotype or biochemical pathway they would cluster together in a dendogram. From what I understand then, I need a GO clustering tool to see my data and a program that can generate clustered heat maps to visualize the expression level for each gene.

    The problem is that there are so many programs available and I don't really understand the differences. I have been told that DAVID is probably the best tool for clustering my data (and well-accepted in the literature). But then I have seen people use Cluster 3.0 - which does not seems to be the same kind of clustering that DAVID does - and then view in Java TreeView.

    Do I use the DAVID "functional annotation clustering" and then import into TreeView? This is what seems to make the most sense to me but I am not sure...

    You can probably tell I am really confused. Any help would be appreciated.

    EDIT: I am now aware that Cluster 3.0 apparently clusters hierarchically based on expression data not gene ontology so that explains my first bit of confusion. I found a nice Nature summary of expression clustering so I think I understand how it works now.

    As for GO clustering though, I would still like to know if using DAVID + TreeView is a good idea. And is there a way to show both expression clustering and GO clustering on the same heatmap? I can't visualize what this would look like but I don't think it would work.
    Last edited by neant; 12-12-2013, 12:31 PM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...