Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mra
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 7

    DESeq2: diff gene expression between species using gene-specific normalization factor

    Hi.

    I'm trying to do differential gene expression analysis between the orthologous genes of two species. Leaving aside the technical and biological complications that this kind of analysis carries, I would like to use DESeq2 to perform the computations.

    To do so, I'm thinking in take advantage of the gene-specific normalization factors (NF_i,j) of DESeq2, which are used, alongside the common scale quantity q_i,j, to define the expected value of observed counts in gene i and sample j (mu_i,j):

    mu_i,j = q_i,j * NF_i,j

    Since in my case besides differences in the library size between samples, I also have to take care of the differences in gene length between species, I'm using a form of NF_i,j defined as:

    NF_i,j = s_j * L_i,j

    Where L_i,j is the length of gene i on condition j, and s_j has the same meaning that in regular analysis but is computed using length-normalized counts:

    s_j = median_i { ( k_i,j / L_i,j ) / [ Prod_{v=1,...,m} k_i,v / L_i,j ]^(1/m) }

    I would greatly appreciate any comments on the soundness (or lack of it) of this approach. Better ideas to do the analysis are more than welcome.

    Thanks,
    mra
    Last edited by mra; 12-14-2013, 11:30 AM.
  • Michael Love
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 333

    #2
    hi,

    This looks correct to me.

    So you counted genes using different gene models for each species?

    Comment

    • mra
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 7

      #3
      Hi Michael.

      Yes, I used species-specific annotations files.

      Comment

      • Michael Love
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 333

        #4
        Then I think your formulation looks correct.

        Comment

        • Michael Love
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 333

          #5
          This question came up a few more times, so we implemented an argument normMatrix to estimateSizeFactors() (DESeq2 >= 1.6). So normMatrix would be L in your case. The estimateSizeFactors() function will then correct for library size taking into consideration this matrix of multiplicative factors, as you have done above but additionally ensuring that the mean of normalized counts is on the same scale as the mean of unnormalized counts by dividing out the geometric mean. Then it stores a normalizationFactor matrix which combines both normMatrix and the library size correction. The code itself can be seen in DESeq2:::estimateNormFactors (an unexported function).

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          54 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...