Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zapages
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 98

    Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2 Analysis Questions

    Hi Everyone,

    I have simple small question in regards to Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2. I had two different experimental sets from NCBI Geo.

    Let's call them Experimental Set A and Experimental Set B.

    The Experimental Set A was phred33 (Sanger/Illumina 1.8+) and Experimental Set B was phred64 (Illumina .18).

    I ran Tophat 2 and Cufflinks 2.0.8. Everything has worked well up to know. I did not use Cufflinks 2.1.1 because of the high and low confidence interval bug in the application.

    Now I was wondering should I run them with Cuffmerge 2.0.2 or Cuffmerge 2.1.1 on them and likewise for Cuffdiff2.1.1 or Cuffdiff2.0.2? Does it really matter which one that I use?

    On top of this, should merge both experimental Set A and Experimental Set B's Cufflinks files together? Does it really matter what their original phred score was they have gone through Tophat2 and Cufflinks2?

    What are the recommended parameters for Cuffdiff2 for comparing gene expression between two organs in the same species.

    Is 10 a good value for Minimum per-locus counts for significance testing?

    Should I perform a multi-hit correction? I did this for Cufflinks in the past, but I never went further to Cuffmerge2/Cuffdiff2/Cummerbund.

    Should I normalize the data based on the known hits to transcript or should I go with total hits for the normalization process. What's the difference?

    What value should I place for the recommended False discovery rate value and for Jensen-Shannon replicates? I was thinking of stating 0.5.

    Is 0.1 a good value to place in for Cuffmerge2's Discard Isoforms with abundance below this (0-1)?

    Sorry for the so many questions. Its my first time doing Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2.

    Then I hope to use Cummerbund through R to see the difference of gene expression for specific genes of interest for us.

    Thank you in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
26 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
43 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...