Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zapages
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 98

    #1

    Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2 Analysis Questions

    Hi Everyone,

    I have simple small question in regards to Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2. I had two different experimental sets from NCBI Geo.

    Let's call them Experimental Set A and Experimental Set B.

    The Experimental Set A was phred33 (Sanger/Illumina 1.8+) and Experimental Set B was phred64 (Illumina .18).

    I ran Tophat 2 and Cufflinks 2.0.8. Everything has worked well up to know. I did not use Cufflinks 2.1.1 because of the high and low confidence interval bug in the application.

    Now I was wondering should I run them with Cuffmerge 2.0.2 or Cuffmerge 2.1.1 on them and likewise for Cuffdiff2.1.1 or Cuffdiff2.0.2? Does it really matter which one that I use?

    On top of this, should merge both experimental Set A and Experimental Set B's Cufflinks files together? Does it really matter what their original phred score was they have gone through Tophat2 and Cufflinks2?

    What are the recommended parameters for Cuffdiff2 for comparing gene expression between two organs in the same species.

    Is 10 a good value for Minimum per-locus counts for significance testing?

    Should I perform a multi-hit correction? I did this for Cufflinks in the past, but I never went further to Cuffmerge2/Cuffdiff2/Cummerbund.

    Should I normalize the data based on the known hits to transcript or should I go with total hits for the normalization process. What's the difference?

    What value should I place for the recommended False discovery rate value and for Jensen-Shannon replicates? I was thinking of stating 0.5.

    Is 0.1 a good value to place in for Cuffmerge2's Discard Isoforms with abundance below this (0-1)?

    Sorry for the so many questions. Its my first time doing Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2.

    Then I hope to use Cummerbund through R to see the difference of gene expression for specific genes of interest for us.

    Thank you in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
    by SEQadmin2


    Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

    We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
    ...
    09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
0 responses
38 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
0 responses
44 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...