Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Zapages
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 98

    #1

    Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2 Analysis Questions

    Hi Everyone,

    I have simple small question in regards to Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2. I had two different experimental sets from NCBI Geo.

    Let's call them Experimental Set A and Experimental Set B.

    The Experimental Set A was phred33 (Sanger/Illumina 1.8+) and Experimental Set B was phred64 (Illumina .18).

    I ran Tophat 2 and Cufflinks 2.0.8. Everything has worked well up to know. I did not use Cufflinks 2.1.1 because of the high and low confidence interval bug in the application.

    Now I was wondering should I run them with Cuffmerge 2.0.2 or Cuffmerge 2.1.1 on them and likewise for Cuffdiff2.1.1 or Cuffdiff2.0.2? Does it really matter which one that I use?

    On top of this, should merge both experimental Set A and Experimental Set B's Cufflinks files together? Does it really matter what their original phred score was they have gone through Tophat2 and Cufflinks2?

    What are the recommended parameters for Cuffdiff2 for comparing gene expression between two organs in the same species.

    Is 10 a good value for Minimum per-locus counts for significance testing?

    Should I perform a multi-hit correction? I did this for Cufflinks in the past, but I never went further to Cuffmerge2/Cuffdiff2/Cummerbund.

    Should I normalize the data based on the known hits to transcript or should I go with total hits for the normalization process. What's the difference?

    What value should I place for the recommended False discovery rate value and for Jensen-Shannon replicates? I was thinking of stating 0.5.

    Is 0.1 a good value to place in for Cuffmerge2's Discard Isoforms with abundance below this (0-1)?

    Sorry for the so many questions. Its my first time doing Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2.

    Then I hope to use Cummerbund through R to see the difference of gene expression for specific genes of interest for us.

    Thank you in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • kinpict.com
    Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by kinpict.com
    The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
    Today, 06:37 PM
  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
0 responses
27 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
35 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
2 responses
56 views
0 reactions
Last Post kinpict.com  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
175 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...