Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2 Analysis Questions

    Hi Everyone,

    I have simple small question in regards to Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2. I had two different experimental sets from NCBI Geo.

    Let's call them Experimental Set A and Experimental Set B.

    The Experimental Set A was phred33 (Sanger/Illumina 1.8+) and Experimental Set B was phred64 (Illumina .18).

    I ran Tophat 2 and Cufflinks 2.0.8. Everything has worked well up to know. I did not use Cufflinks 2.1.1 because of the high and low confidence interval bug in the application.

    Now I was wondering should I run them with Cuffmerge 2.0.2 or Cuffmerge 2.1.1 on them and likewise for Cuffdiff2.1.1 or Cuffdiff2.0.2? Does it really matter which one that I use?

    On top of this, should merge both experimental Set A and Experimental Set B's Cufflinks files together? Does it really matter what their original phred score was they have gone through Tophat2 and Cufflinks2?

    What are the recommended parameters for Cuffdiff2 for comparing gene expression between two organs in the same species.

    Is 10 a good value for Minimum per-locus counts for significance testing?

    Should I perform a multi-hit correction? I did this for Cufflinks in the past, but I never went further to Cuffmerge2/Cuffdiff2/Cummerbund.

    Should I normalize the data based on the known hits to transcript or should I go with total hits for the normalization process. What's the difference?

    What value should I place for the recommended False discovery rate value and for Jensen-Shannon replicates? I was thinking of stating 0.5.

    Is 0.1 a good value to place in for Cuffmerge2's Discard Isoforms with abundance below this (0-1)?

    Sorry for the so many questions. Its my first time doing Cuffmerge2 and Cuffdiff2.

    Then I hope to use Cummerbund through R to see the difference of gene expression for specific genes of interest for us.

    Thank you in advance.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
29 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
31 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X