Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ljw1001
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 2

    Sample case/control variants for any human phenotypes

    Hi,

    I'm new to bioinformatics and doing some experimental work in machine learning. I'm looking for sample variant data with the following characteristics:

    - human
    - ideally vcf format
    - samples tagged with phenotypes or marked as case/control for a given phenotype. Alternately, pairs of cancer/normal samples would probably do
    - more samples is better

    if there are any publicly accessible datasets with these characteristics, it would be super helpful. I've looked at 1000G, but they seem to be all apparently normal, and clinvar, but they seem to collect data about variants, but not individuals. I'm really looking for sets of samples where some are affected and some not, for a given feature.

    Thank you!!
  • donfreed
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 4

    #2
    Hi,

    It sounds like the ideal data repository for your project would be dbGaP. However, the data is controlled access and might be difficult for your lab to apply for.

    If dbGaP is not feasible, then I think the next best place to look would be the NCBI SRA. Although this data may not be ideal.

    Comment

    • ljw1001
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks donfreed.

      I think you are right that dbGaP would be perfect and that I won't get access . I will dig more into NCBI_SRA.

      If I drop the requirement that the data be human, does that open up any possibilities? Really looking for nextgen samples (hence the VCF preference) with phenotypic features associated, but mice or another species would make for a good proof of concept.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...