Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OTU
    Member
    • May 2013
    • 44

    sequence coverage format trouble

    Hi everyone!

    I am using bowtie2 to map my reads on scaffolds and I would like to know, is there a way to get a coverage calculation in samtools? I know that I can use BEDTools, but how can I get .bed format from bam? And for my analysis pipeline I need .csv format of coverage information, which is not created in BEDTools.
    Any ideas how I can do this?


    Help!:
    Last edited by OTU; 01-23-2014, 02:13 PM.
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    There are several solutions on this biostars page including a "samtools depth" one: http://www.biostars.org/p/5165/

    Comment

    • OTU
      Member
      • May 2013
      • 44

      #3
      Thank you!
      However, I wasn't able to find a way to get the information on coverage to be in csv format.
      I used this:
      samtools depth *bamfile* | awk '{sum+=$3} END { print "Average = ",sum/NR}'

      And got the number. Is there a way to get it in csv format?

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Code:
        samtools depth *bamfile* | awk '{sum+=$3} END { printf("Average,%f\n",sum/NR)}' > some_file.csv
        Will make the output comma separated (csv is just a text file with commas as column separators).

        Comment

        • GenoMax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 7142

          #5
          That awk script only prints a single number for the whole bam so that is probably not the output OTU is looking for.

          @OTU Are you looking to get a "depth" number for each scaffold?

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          23 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...