Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dpryan
    replied
    Yes, chimeric alignments cut reads in two (or more). If the read was originally 100bp, then the first alignment might just be 40bp and the second 60. Usually the entirety of the sequence isn't put in either of the alignments (i.e., it's not hard-clipped). A secondary alignment will be of the same length and sequence as the primary alignment, since it's just an alternative mapping (i.e., the read is a multimapper).

    Leave a comment:


  • dnusol
    replied
    Thanks for your input dpryan, it is very helpful.
    I think I understand the example of a chromosomal inversion. I am trying to interpret the SAM format for such reads.
    So does a chimeric alignment cut the read in two? and thus in the SAM format a chimeric alignment will have a primary alignment with a CIGAR of lenght say 'X' less than the total read length, and a SA: tag with a length say 'Y' less than the total read lenght?
    Is this the difference from a read indicating that the alignment is not primary?

    Leave a comment:


  • dpryan
    replied
    The 0x800 concept is relatively new and meant to convey chimeric/non-linear alignments. Suppose you have a chromosomal inversion with a read mapping over its junction point. The first part of the read will map normally and then be truncated. The second part of the read will map further up/downstream and in the wrong orientation. Because of this, it doesn't map linearly along the chromosome so the 0x800 bit in the FLAG is set.

    I should note that the lack of the 0x800 bit being set doesn't always mean that a read is not chimeric. Tophat2, for example, can produce mappings, but doesn't set that bit (tophat-fusion predates the addition of the 0x800 bit to the SAM spec.).

    Leave a comment:


  • dnusol
    started a topic Not primary vs Supplementary alignment

    Not primary vs Supplementary alignment

    Hi,

    can anyone explain to me the difference (if there is one) between a read having a 0x100 flag (not primary alignment) and a read having a 0x800 flag (supplementary alignment)? How does the alignment differ between these two reads? can one read have both flags assigned?

    Cheers,

    Dave

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Best Practices for Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis
    by seqadmin



    While isolating and preparing single cells for sequencing was historically the bottleneck, recent technological advancements have shifted the challenge to data analysis. This highlights the rapidly evolving nature of single-cell sequencing. The inherent complexity of single-cell analysis has intensified with the surge in data volume and the incorporation of diverse and more complex datasets. This article explores the challenges in analysis, examines common pitfalls, offers...
    06-06-2024, 07:15 AM
  • seqadmin
    Latest Developments in Precision Medicine
    by seqadmin



    Technological advances have led to drastic improvements in the field of precision medicine, enabling more personalized approaches to treatment. This article explores four leading groups that are overcoming many of the challenges of genomic profiling and precision medicine through their innovative platforms and technologies.

    Somatic Genomics
    “We have such a tremendous amount of genetic diversity that exists within each of us, and not just between us as individuals,”...
    05-24-2024, 01:16 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 06-14-2024, 07:24 AM
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 06-13-2024, 08:58 AM
0 responses
14 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 06-12-2024, 02:20 PM
0 responses
17 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 06-07-2024, 06:58 AM
0 responses
186 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X