Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JdeBruin
    Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 25

    #1

    SNP calling on low coverage NGS data

    Hi,

    I am new to SNP calling and would appreciate some input. I want to try and call SNP's for a specific organisms. The hurdles I have is, I do not have a reference genome to map against and I have a very low coverage 4x per organisms.

    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
  • TiborNagy
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 329

    #2
    The problem is the following: If you do not have reference genome, you need a de-novo assembly. You can find heterozygous positions in de-novo (which can be called SNPs), but in you case only two reads support this hipothesis.
    So, use this sequences to create a reference and sequence other samples to find SNPs or make a higher coverage sequencing from the initial sample.

    Comment

    • SNPsaurus
      Registered Vendor
      • May 2013
      • 525

      #3
      4X read depth can be even more misleading, since at heterozygous loci you will sometimes get 2 reads per allele, but also 3 reads to one allele vs 1 read for the other, or even 4 reads to one allele and no reads for the other. On the other hand, any allele supported by a few reads is probably real; you just can't fully genotype the sample but you can identify SNPs.

      Genotyping by sequencing was developed to solve this problem. By sequencing only 10,000-100,000 loci across a genome, the reads attain good depth with a small amount of sequencing. We do genotyping by sequencing, as do other companies and academic cores. You don't need a reference for the informatics, but rather the reads can just be compared from sample to sample using a core set of reads representing the loci as a reference.
      Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

      Comment

      • swbarnes2
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 910

        #4
        You are in trouble. 4x is not enough for de novo assembly, and it is not really enough for calling homozygous SNPs, let alone heterozygous ones.

        If these are all the same species, I'd combine all the reads together, and do de novo assembly on that. Then align each sample's reads to that assembly, call SNPs on those alignments, and realize that you are going to miss most of the heterozygous SNPs, and many homozygous ones too.

        Comment

        • Naibin Duan
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2014
          • 4

          #5
          4X coveragedata without reference is almost impossible to call

          In my opinion,4X coverage reseq-data without any reference is almost impossible to call SNP.
          Best.
          Naibin

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            Yesterday, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          8 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
          0 responses
          15 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...