Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Justin AC Powell
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 5

    Limma removeBatchEffect question

    I'm using limma_3.14.1

    Suppose I set up:

    data<-c(2,2,3,3,5,6,7,8)
    data<-rbind(data,data) # Two row matrix


    batch<-factor(c("b1","b1","b2","b2","b1","b1","b2","b2"))
    treat<-factor(c("a","a","a","a","control","control","b","b"))
    treat<-relevel(treat,ref="control")


    We can see from the first 4 data points with identical treatment that the bach effct of b2 vs b1 is +1.


    removeBatchEffect(data,batch=batch,design=model.matrix(~treat))

    This results in

    [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8]
    data 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 5 6 7 8
    data 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 5 6 7 8


    i.e. The batch effect has been corrected for in the first 4 columns.
    However the last four columns which also belong to batch b1 or b2 are not adjusted.

    Whereas, if I run limma with the batch factor included in the design matrix to estimate the fold change between treatment "b" and the control (i.e. the data in the last four columns)

    fit <- lmFit(data,design=model.matrix(~batch+treat))
    fit <- eBayes(fit)
    topTable(fit,coef="treatb")


    I get:


    row ID logFC AveExpr t P.Value adj.P.Val B
    1 data 1 4.5 1.235397 0.2517299 0.2517299 -4.591222
    2 data 1 4.5 1.235397 0.2517299 0.2517299 -4.591222


    Here we see that limma has effectively reduced the log2(FC) of treatment b vs control from 2 to 1 because of the batch factor.

    So my question is, why does removeBatcheffects not act similarly and return rows reading 2.5,2.5,2.5,2.5,5.5,6.5,6.5,7.5? Have I made an error, or does removeBatchEffect work in a subtly different way?
    Last edited by Justin AC Powell; 02-17-2014, 07:26 AM.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
54 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...