Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mrfox
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 103

    readgroup questions

    hi all,
    I know that there have been many posts about readgroup in SAM/BAM format. But I am still confused.

    Assume I have a sample named "Treated"sequenced with Illumina HiSeq platform. There are 5 pairs of the fastq files. I map each of the small fastq file using BWA and add read group when I merge the pairs of small bam files. For the first pair of bam files, can I just use "Treated_1" as its readgroup and "Treated_2" for the 2nd pair of bam files?

    An opposite question: if I merge the fastq files for one end to get a file s1.fastq, then I merge the fastq files for the other end to get s2.fastq. Then I removed the original 5 pairs of original small fastq files. My question is, is there any to for me to seperate the merged s1.fq and s2.fq back into the 5 pairs of small fastq files?

    Hope my description is clear. Thank you all!
  • TiborNagy
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 329

    #2
    It is depends how do you run bwa. If you use bwa samse for each fastq files, then the readgroup can identify the pairs individually (you get 10 different readgroups). If you use bwa sampe, then readgroups identify the samples (you get 5 different readgroups).

    No. If you merge your fastq files before alignment, you can not separate them from the bam file.

    Comment

    • mrfox
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 103

      #3
      Thank you TiborNagy.

      I agree with you. Unfortunately, I mapped the merged fastq files and the original small fastq files were deleted accidentally. I realized that properly adding readgroup info from the bam file is impossible. I will request the original small fastq files and re-map them.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      10 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...