Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jereeder
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 1

    #1

    CEAS giving strange graphical output when supplying --gn-groups

    I'm trying to run CEAS on two different sets of genes that are present in my ChIP-seq, but it seems as though I'm doing something incorrectly. When I run CEAS without the --gn-groups parameter, I get great results. I see reasonable looking profiles in the wiggle section of the .pdf output.

    However, when I run CEAS with the --gn-groups parameter and two lists of genes, the average profiles don't look right at all. Both gene groups are simply graphed as perfectly vertical lines. This is definitely not correct, they should have a broad looking profile.

    Here's my command line:

    ceas --name CEAS_TSGTDG --gn-groups=TSG_list.txt,TDG_list.txt --gn-group-names='TSG,TDG' -g ../../../hg19.refGene -b MACSpeaks.bed -w MACS2_treat_pileup.wig

    I know that my bed and wig files are good, because I get good output without supplying --gn-groups. I'm wondering if I'm not using the proper format for my "TSG_list.txt" and "TDG_list.txt"? They're simply a list of gene names followed by newlines. Here's an excerpt of TDG_list.txt:

    BZRAP1
    PEX13
    NEK4
    RNASEH2B
    C12orf57

    Am I doing something wrong?
  • hartmaier
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 12

    #2
    Originally posted by jereeder View Post
    I'm trying to run CEAS on two different sets of genes that are present in my ChIP-seq, but it seems as though I'm doing something incorrectly. When I run CEAS without the --gn-groups parameter, I get great results. I see reasonable looking profiles in the wiggle section of the .pdf output.

    However, when I run CEAS with the --gn-groups parameter and two lists of genes, the average profiles don't look right at all. Both gene groups are simply graphed as perfectly vertical lines. This is definitely not correct, they should have a broad looking profile.

    Here's my command line:

    ceas --name CEAS_TSGTDG --gn-groups=TSG_list.txt,TDG_list.txt --gn-group-names='TSG,TDG' -g ../../../hg19.refGene -b MACSpeaks.bed -w MACS2_treat_pileup.wig

    I know that my bed and wig files are good, because I get good output without supplying --gn-groups. I'm wondering if I'm not using the proper format for my "TSG_list.txt" and "TDG_list.txt"? They're simply a list of gene names followed by newlines. Here's an excerpt of TDG_list.txt:

    BZRAP1
    PEX13
    NEK4
    RNASEH2B
    C12orf57

    Am I doing something wrong?
    I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?

    Comment

    • cjsifuen
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 9

      #3
      Originally posted by hartmaier View Post
      I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?
      Same issue here. I guess no one has figured this out yet. :/

      Comment

      • ygc_hku
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2014
        • 6

        #4
        You may found my package interesting. https://github.com/GuangchuangYu/ChIPseeker

        Comment

        • cjsifuen
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 9

          #5
          Originally posted by hartmaier View Post
          I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?
          I found out what was going on in my case. Essentially, the gene identifiers in the group file were not the same type as in the refgene file. I was using the refgene files from UCSC, which uses refseq mrna nomenclature, but my group text files had ensembl_gene_ids.

          I converted the gene names in the group files to refseq mrna ids and the problem was solved.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • kinpict.com
            Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by kinpict.com
            The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
            Today, 06:37 PM
          • SEQadmin2
            16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
            by SEQadmin2





            NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
            10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
          0 responses
          35 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
          2 responses
          56 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post kinpict.com  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
          0 responses
          175 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...