Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jereeder
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 1

    #1

    CEAS giving strange graphical output when supplying --gn-groups

    I'm trying to run CEAS on two different sets of genes that are present in my ChIP-seq, but it seems as though I'm doing something incorrectly. When I run CEAS without the --gn-groups parameter, I get great results. I see reasonable looking profiles in the wiggle section of the .pdf output.

    However, when I run CEAS with the --gn-groups parameter and two lists of genes, the average profiles don't look right at all. Both gene groups are simply graphed as perfectly vertical lines. This is definitely not correct, they should have a broad looking profile.

    Here's my command line:

    ceas --name CEAS_TSGTDG --gn-groups=TSG_list.txt,TDG_list.txt --gn-group-names='TSG,TDG' -g ../../../hg19.refGene -b MACSpeaks.bed -w MACS2_treat_pileup.wig

    I know that my bed and wig files are good, because I get good output without supplying --gn-groups. I'm wondering if I'm not using the proper format for my "TSG_list.txt" and "TDG_list.txt"? They're simply a list of gene names followed by newlines. Here's an excerpt of TDG_list.txt:

    BZRAP1
    PEX13
    NEK4
    RNASEH2B
    C12orf57

    Am I doing something wrong?
  • hartmaier
    Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 12

    #2
    Originally posted by jereeder View Post
    I'm trying to run CEAS on two different sets of genes that are present in my ChIP-seq, but it seems as though I'm doing something incorrectly. When I run CEAS without the --gn-groups parameter, I get great results. I see reasonable looking profiles in the wiggle section of the .pdf output.

    However, when I run CEAS with the --gn-groups parameter and two lists of genes, the average profiles don't look right at all. Both gene groups are simply graphed as perfectly vertical lines. This is definitely not correct, they should have a broad looking profile.

    Here's my command line:

    ceas --name CEAS_TSGTDG --gn-groups=TSG_list.txt,TDG_list.txt --gn-group-names='TSG,TDG' -g ../../../hg19.refGene -b MACSpeaks.bed -w MACS2_treat_pileup.wig

    I know that my bed and wig files are good, because I get good output without supplying --gn-groups. I'm wondering if I'm not using the proper format for my "TSG_list.txt" and "TDG_list.txt"? They're simply a list of gene names followed by newlines. Here's an excerpt of TDG_list.txt:

    BZRAP1
    PEX13
    NEK4
    RNASEH2B
    C12orf57

    Am I doing something wrong?
    I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?

    Comment

    • cjsifuen
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2013
      • 9

      #3
      Originally posted by hartmaier View Post
      I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?
      Same issue here. I guess no one has figured this out yet. :/

      Comment

      • ygc_hku
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2014
        • 6

        #4
        You may found my package interesting. https://github.com/GuangchuangYu/ChIPseeker

        Comment

        • cjsifuen
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2013
          • 9

          #5
          Originally posted by hartmaier View Post
          I am having the same issue. Did you ever figure this out?
          I found out what was going on in my case. Essentially, the gene identifiers in the group file were not the same type as in the refgene file. I was using the refgene files from UCSC, which uses refseq mrna nomenclature, but my group text files had ensembl_gene_ids.

          I converted the gene names in the group files to refseq mrna ids and the problem was solved.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
          0 responses
          13 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          40 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          26 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...