Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AleixArnau
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 7

    #1

    newbler, parameters to improve my cDNA assembly de novo

    I'm trying to assemble de novo cDNA reads from transcriptome of Begonia using Newbler but actually the result isn't really good... I've used the configured parameters since it's my first assembly. I would like to know, if there are someone who used to run Newbler, which parameters could I change in order to improve my results. That are the parameters:

    Input: minimum read length: 20 Computation: seed step:12 seed length:16 seed count:1 minimum overlap length:40 minimun overlap identity:90 alignment identity score: 2 alignment difference score:-3

    Thanks for all!
  • flxlex
    Moderator
    • Nov 2008
    • 412

    #2
    Originally posted by AleixArnau View Post
    the result isn't really good...
    You really need to specify what you mean by that. Also, giving a bit of information an what kind and how many reads you have will help too...

    Comment

    • AleixArnau
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2014
      • 7

      #3
      It's the transcriptome of a specie of Begonia, about 250.000 reads sequenced by 454. We want to assembly again because in next steps did a BLAST of isotigs from each isogroup against the genome and that showed that ~50% of isogroups with >1 isotig matched different genome contigs, suggesting these were incorrectly assigned as alternative transcripts. So, we would like to know which parameters we can change to try to improve our assembly for that transcriptome.

      Thanks!

      Comment

      • flxlex
        Moderator
        • Nov 2008
        • 412

        #4
        How big is the genome and expected transcriptome? how much coverage do you have? How good is the assembly? You mapping could be explained by the genome contigs being very fragmented, some of them having just one exon, for example...

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        67 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...