Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ron128
    replied
    Originally posted by dpryan View Post
    At least from the 2 reads you posted it looks like phred+64, so some variant of illumina before 1.8. You can get an idea of whether it's Solexa by just grepping for ">" or "?", which won't be present in any of the Illumina formats that have offsets of 64.

    BTW, it's already a fastq file, you just need to let your aligner know how the quality scores are encoded (though many of the newer aligners only support phred+33).
    @ Mr Ryan: I might be mistaken, but i was kinda certain thats not a fastq format file. If you look at the fourth line, it has these weird stretches of "________" characters. what gives? I have not come across such a fastq file, with my limited expertise.

    Besides this, when I use a qc program like prinseq, to perform basic QC, it gives me the following error:
    "ERROR: input file for -fastq is in UNKNOWN format not in FASTQ format. Exit program."

    I wonder what could be the issue here. At first I thought this might be an unix issue, so I ran dos2unix on the files. however prinseq is not able to recognize these files anyways. Thanks for your input Mr Ryan

    Leave a comment:


  • GenoMax
    replied
    Originally posted by rajajjcet View Post
    hi, my research is going on short read sequence alignment . how to g.et online short read alignment tools and input data format
    Most prevalent input data format is FASTQ: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format

    List of NGS tools (look for aligners): http://seqanswers.com/wiki/Software/list

    Data can be downloaded from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra

    Leave a comment:


  • rajajjcet
    replied
    short read alignment tools ?

    hi, my research is going on short read sequence alignment . how to g.et online short read alignment tools and input data format
    Originally posted by ron128 View Post
    Hello,
    I have been dealing with some strange data recently. I suspect this might be illumina's older casava (pre 1.8) output from the GAIIX. unfortunately the lab where i work at has no clue about this data, and the service provider has shut shop Can anybody tell me in their experience, what data format is it? I assumed it to be the older solexa data format and tried to convert it to fastq using maq sol2sanger, but I am getting an error which goes like:

    "Inconsistent sequence name: HWUSI-EAS1642R_0000:5:1:2782:993#GATCAG/1. Continue anyway.
    Segmentation fault (core dumped)"


    Sample file:

    @HWUSI-EAS1642R_0000:5:1:2782:993#GATCAG/1
    NCATTAAAGCAATCATCCATCCTGACCAAGTAGGTTTTATTCCAGGAATGCAGGGATGGTTTAATATACGAAAATCCATCAATGTAATCCACTATATAAA
    +HWUSI-EAS1642R_000:5:1:2782:993#GATCAG/1
    BGIFGHIHHI[W[YYVYYYYY[Y[[YYYYY[[[Y[VVPVOQQ____________TTVVTVYYYYYYYYYRWWWWW___Y_____PYYYYYWWPWWYYVYR
    @HWUSI-EAS1642R_0000:5:1:3250:998#GATCAG/1
    NACTATCCAGAGTCACTCAAAAGGGAGACAAGCACTTGGTGCCACATCAACACAAAACTCATAAGAGCTAGAAACACACTCAAAATTGATCATTAATATA
    +HWUSI-EAS1642R_000:5:1:3250:998#GATCAG/1
    BIGKMLLQRN_________WV___________________NRRTR_Y_________QQY________________[Y[[PWWWWW[YY[[WYYWY_____


    ANy inputs will be much appreciated. Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • paa6
    replied
    Originally posted by ron128 View Post
    Thanks a lot for your insight sir! however like i mentioned, the service provider has folded, and the only access to data that we have is this data here. Is there any way I can convert this data to .fastq format? What IS this data format anyways? Thanks for taking the time out to reply. Much Appreciated
    ahhh no need to be formal by the way...and I am not sir..I am mam...I have analysed ur file and this is fastq file...and use fastqc for analysis of ur sequence before doing anything further....

    Leave a comment:


  • dpryan
    replied
    At least from the 2 reads you posted it looks like phred+64, so some variant of illumina before 1.8. You can get an idea of whether it's Solexa by just grepping for ">" or "?", which won't be present in any of the Illumina formats that have offsets of 64.

    BTW, it's already a fastq file, you just need to let your aligner know how the quality scores are encoded (though many of the newer aligners only support phred+33).
    Last edited by dpryan; 03-26-2014, 02:46 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ron128
    replied
    Originally posted by paa6 View Post
    HMM I will suggest u not to convert the file format because it's really useless from my experience in this case. I had the same problem and infact what i faced that after converting it into fastq i got NNNNN like this kind of bases all over in my reads... so it's kind of very risky...n I will suggest u to get fastq file...for further work else no use...ggod luck
    !!!
    Thanks a lot for your insight sir! however like i mentioned, the service provider has folded, and the only access to data that we have is this data here. Is there any way I can convert this data to .fastq format? What IS this data format anyways? Thanks for taking the time out to reply. Much Appreciated

    Leave a comment:


  • paa6
    replied
    Originally posted by ron128 View Post
    A google search for this error reveals the following, but I am not sure how fiddling with original sequencer output files, or raw fastq files will work out.

    http://sourceforge.net/p/maq/mailman...u-tokyo.ac.jp/
    HMM I will suggest u not to convert the file format because it's really useless from my experience in this case. I had the same problem and infact what i faced that after converting it into fastq i got NNNNN like this kind of bases all over in my reads... so it's kind of very risky...n I will suggest u to get fastq file...for further work else no use...ggod luck
    !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • ron128
    replied
    A google search for this error reveals the following, but I am not sure how fiddling with original sequencer output files, or raw fastq files will work out.

    Leave a comment:


  • ron128
    started a topic Data format of NGS file

    Data format of NGS file

    Hello,
    I have been dealing with some strange data recently. I suspect this might be illumina's older casava (pre 1.8) output from the GAIIX. unfortunately the lab where i work at has no clue about this data, and the service provider has shut shop Can anybody tell me in their experience, what data format is it? I assumed it to be the older solexa data format and tried to convert it to fastq using maq sol2sanger, but I am getting an error which goes like:

    "Inconsistent sequence name: HWUSI-EAS1642R_0000:5:1:2782:993#GATCAG/1. Continue anyway.
    Segmentation fault (core dumped)"


    Sample file:

    @HWUSI-EAS1642R_0000:5:1:2782:993#GATCAG/1
    NCATTAAAGCAATCATCCATCCTGACCAAGTAGGTTTTATTCCAGGAATGCAGGGATGGTTTAATATACGAAAATCCATCAATGTAATCCACTATATAAA
    +HWUSI-EAS1642R_000:5:1:2782:993#GATCAG/1
    BGIFGHIHHI[W[YYVYYYYY[Y[[YYYYY[[[Y[VVPVOQQ____________TTVVTVYYYYYYYYYRWWWWW___Y_____PYYYYYWWPWWYYVYR
    @HWUSI-EAS1642R_0000:5:1:3250:998#GATCAG/1
    NACTATCCAGAGTCACTCAAAAGGGAGACAAGCACTTGGTGCCACATCAACACAAAACTCATAAGAGCTAGAAACACACTCAAAATTGATCATTAATATA
    +HWUSI-EAS1642R_000:5:1:3250:998#GATCAG/1
    BIGKMLLQRN_________WV___________________NRRTR_Y_________QQY________________[Y[[PWWWWW[YY[[WYYWY_____


    ANy inputs will be much appreciated. Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2





    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 07:59 AM
0 responses
13 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
0 responses
32 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
0 responses
45 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
169 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...