Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mizar106
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 6

    Run blat on multiple processor cores

    Hi guys!
    I'm completely new in the NGS-community! I'm interested obviously in NGS-data analysis but still not very familiar with a series of technical issues normally encountered in this field.
    In particular, my problem now is that I have to run blat-mapping of a fasta file on the whole human genome (1 different fasta per chromosome). Since I work just only with my own machine (having 16 cores in total) I was trying to find an efficient method/strategy to split each blat job on multiple cores on the machine. Concerning this, I found and tested GNU-parallel but after one complete day of tests it does not work. does somebody know how to use that or maybe some other strategy to split every single job (I will have 1 job = 1 chromosome) on multiple cores? For me it seems a bit difficult to solve this.
    Thanks a lot in advance!!!!
  • GenoMax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2008
    • 7142

    #2
    How much memory do you have? Remember that blat keeps entire reference index in memory so if you start 16 parallel jobs each may need a copy in memory (in case GNU-parallel truly treats these as separate jobs, I am not familiar with that part).

    When you say "it does not work" what is exactly happening? Errors?

    Comment

    • mizar106
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2014
      • 6

      #3
      Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
      How much memory do you have? Remember that blat keeps entire reference index in memory so if you start 16 parallel jobs each may need a copy in memory (in case GNU-parallel truly treats these as separate jobs, I am not familiar with that part).

      When you say "it does not work" what is exactly happening? Errors?
      Hi, thank you fot the answer!
      Actually the 'parallel' program didn't work properly because I didn't understand the correct arguments of GNU parallel to specify into the command line with blat , but finally I was able to find the correct command and It works. The problem from what I understood about GNU-parallel is that it allows to run simultaneously multiple jobs such a way that 1 job runs on 1 core..but this is not really what I need, unfortunately. I'm looking for a way to run a single job on multiple cores (lika to 'split' the job let's say). I have a machine with 2 Intel Xeon processors equiped with 8 cores each one (but in the monitoring system dialog I see 32 cpus in total, maybe beacuse threads are 2 x each core?), the RAM is 64Gb in total.
      Thanks for any help.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        A search brings up this: http://code.google.com/p/pblat/ I have not personally used it but you may want to give it a try.

        Comment

        • mizar106
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2014
          • 6

          #5
          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          A search brings up this: http://code.google.com/p/pblat/ I have not personally used it but you may want to give it a try.
          Seems to be interesting! thanks a lot!!!

          Comment

          • jp.
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2013
            • 142

            #6
            Hi all
            I m doing exome seq mutation using PICAR+GATK followed by annovar. I have successfully completed the pipelines and got my resuts. However, I want to filter out my SNPs using blat??
            can some one help me or guide me on how to filter out failed blat SNPs using blat ?
            thank you in advance

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            51 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            110 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...