Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • meher
    Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 54

    #1

    Comparision of CNVs from Two different platfroms

    Hi,

    I am quiet new to CNV analysis and i have a general query.

    I have SNP array data from Affymetrix and Illumina, would you please comment (or provide a reference) on the pros and cons of using two different platforms, like the possible issues to make a comparision between the CNV results? possible batch effects etc..

    What steps should be considered when using data from two different platforms. Any references would be helpful.
  • mastal
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 666

    #2
    Do you mean that you have data from Affymetrix genotyping arrays and Illumina genotyping arrays, or Affymetrix arrays and Illumina sequencing data?

    Comment

    • meher
      Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 54

      #3
      Originally posted by mastal View Post
      Do you mean that you have data from Affymetrix genotyping arrays and Illumina genotyping arrays, or Affymetrix arrays and Illumina sequencing data?
      Yes, the data is from Genotyping arrays i.e. Affymetrix genotyping arrays and Illumina genotyping arrays.

      Comment

      • dickie_ho
        Member
        • Mar 2013
        • 27

        #4
        Hey Meher
        Pros i would say having more data, cons - different methods to get your data into penncnv (or your downstream pipeline).
        It really depends on what type of analysis you want to do downstream ?? Association ?? or looking at specific CNVs ?? Batch affects I would assume depending on you preferences (i normally go at least 10 probes and at least 20kb in size -- only because i have sequencing data as well as the arrays) ... if u have access to the DNA, run a taqman on specific CNVs detected on both platforms........ but from my experience, because of the size of CNVs you shouldn't have as many issues as SNPs ... another thing you might like to do is compare all the probes between the two different types of arrays and exclude exclusive probes... I hope this helps and not a repeat of what you already know

        cheers
        Josh

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • kinpict.com
          Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by kinpict.com
          The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
          Today, 06:37 PM
        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2





          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
          10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
        2 responses
        56 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post kinpict.com  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        175 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...