Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheSeqGeek
    Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 40

    #1

    Normalized Values from DESeq2

    This is the raw table example of my data but....

    Gene Name Mutant Mutant Mutant WT WT WT
    A 2343 2341 2842 1549 1303 1123

    Can I get a table that has these normalized from DESeq2
    Last edited by TheSeqGeek; 04-09-2014, 09:22 PM.
  • TheSeqGeek
    Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 40

    #2
    is this correct? or is this for the previous version of DESeq


    normalizedCounts <- t( t(counts(dds)) / sizeFactors(dds) )
    Last edited by TheSeqGeek; 04-09-2014, 07:17 PM.

    Comment

    • dpryan
      Devon Ryan
      • Jul 2011
      • 3478

      #3
      Code:
      counts(dds, normalized=T)

      Comment

      • TheSeqGeek
        Member
        • Feb 2014
        • 40

        #4
        Originally posted by dpryan View Post
        Code:
        counts(dds, normalized=T)
        Thank you

        Those two codes give the same results... Do you know why when I take the normalized to values and perform a log2fold change it is not the same as in DESeq2 log2foldchange


        1.) take average of three replicates for mutant
        2.) take average of three replicates for wt
        3.) log2(mutatnt) - log2(wt)

        This comes close to DESeq2 log2fold change but not quite the same...

        Comment

        • dpryan
          Devon Ryan
          • Jul 2011
          • 3478

          #5
          It'll be a little off due to fold-change shrinkage (i.e., your calculated values should generally be larger).

          Comment

          • TheSeqGeek
            Member
            • Feb 2014
            • 40

            #6
            Originally posted by dpryan View Post
            It'll be a little off due to fold-change shrinkage (i.e., your calculated values should generally be larger).
            Indeed that is the case.

            Thank you

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • kinpict.com
              Reply to 16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by kinpict.com
              The part about this topic feels surprisingly grounded, and the details on the page is the bit that made me slow down. I’d keep <a href="https://kinpict.com/">ai family photo generator</a> bookmarked for later.
              Today, 06:37 PM
            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-12-2026, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            2 responses
            56 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post kinpict.com  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            175 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...