Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AdrianP
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 130

    Best CNV software?

    Hello,

    I know there are many reviews out there, but I can't seem to find exactly what I like.

    I found this software called mrCaNaVaR, and it's great since it has it's own aligner which is supposed to be designed specifically for CNV detection. What's also great about it is that it gives .bed annotation in which it tried to determine copy number of 1kb windows regions.

    What I don't like about this software is that I cannot validate the results with another aligner. If I use bwa to align the reads and then view the .bed annotations from mrCaNaVaR, I find there are regions where mrCaNaVaR says the copy number is 0 meaning no coverage, but bwa find reads that cover that position quite well.

    Right now mrCaNaVaR works by quantifying copy number of windows of 1kb. It would be great if it could quantify the copy number of predefined regions such as genes for example.

    Does anyone know any other software similar to mrCaNaVaR that works with NGS PE data? These are Paired-end samples. Somatic, but not human, I work on fungal pathogens, so I am sequencing spore populations.

    Adrian

    BioStar http://www.biostars.org/p/97688/#97692
  • dickie_ho
    Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 27

    #2
    Hey Adrian

    I currently using excavator and I'm actually very impressed by it because it is the first program i have came across to have cross validation between my SNP array data and my Exome-data.. To top it off, it found other CNVs that were not detected on my SNP arrays and when i put my RNA-seq and smallRNA-seq data over the top its shows overlapping genes not expressed at all (where in all controls it is)...

    So give that a crack and let me know how you get on... PS i work with human so i don't have a clue when it comes to anything else (so this might be useless for you)

    cheers
    Josh

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...