Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • illinu
    Member
    • Jul 2013
    • 55

    SOAPdenovo2 in sleeping state for 4 days

    Hi,

    I am running SOAPdenovo2 with 1 set of paired-end and 1 set mate pair reads, fragments of 300bp with a total to 66X coverage on a genome with estimated 240Mb.

    The sparse_pregraph module on SOAPdenovo2 launched more than 4 days ago and it showed the message below. When I do top it shows in sleeping mode what suggests it could be either reading the reads or writing something but I am concerned it is taking far too long with no verbose on the terminal.

    Any one with experience with SOAPdenovo2 maybe can let me know whether it is normal that it takes this long...

    $ ./SOAPdenovo-127mer sparse_pregraph -s file.config -K 127 -z 240000000 -o pregraph -p 64
    Version 2.04: released on July 13th, 2012
    Compile Apr 9 2014 15:54:20
    ********************
    SparsePregraph
    ********************

    Parameters: pregraph_sparse -s file.config -K 127 -g 15 -z 240000000 -d 1 -e 1 -r 0 -p 64 -o pregraph

    Start to build the sparse de Brujin graph, round: 1
    1 io thread initialized.
    Import reads from file:
    reads/pe_A520-R1.fastq
    64 work threads initialized.

    ...still showing only this on terminal

    $ top
    PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
    44528 x 20 0 9158m 4.4g 1208 S 2419.8 0.9 166092:11 SOAPdenovo-127m
  • colindaven
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 417

    #2
    It should run through very fast, i.e. in minutes to hours, in my experience.
    Are there memory issues ?
    Try the low kmer option as well with the SOAPdenovo-63mer .

    Comment

    • illinu
      Member
      • Jul 2013
      • 55

      #3
      We have 512GB of RAM so no, memory should not be an issue. At the moment there are other processes running but they're not even close to half that memory. I ran kmergenie on the dataset and the best k size is 121 so I guess SOAPdenovo-127mer is the most appropriate?

      Comment

      • fankatt
        Junior Member
        • May 2013
        • 3

        #4
        Originally posted by illinu View Post
        We have 512GB of RAM so no, memory should not be an issue. At the moment there are other processes running but they're not even close to half that memory. I ran kmergenie on the dataset and the best k size is 121 so I guess SOAPdenovo-127mer is the most appropriate?
        Hi, have you figured out what the problem is? I am encountering the same problem. Even I tried 63mer, it is still "sleeping" there.

        I ran this program before, and it went very well--only took ~30 mins to de novo a 8Mb genome. So I am very confused why it's not working now.

        Comment

        • illinu
          Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 55

          #5
          fankatt, I had asm_flags=3 for all three libraries (2 paired end and 1 mate pair), I changed asm_flags=1 for paired end and asm_flags=2 for mate pairs. Also I gave rank=1 to all three libraries (not sure if this influenced, it shouldn't). I then ran it manually step by step.

          As a reference, my run took:
          sparse pregraph: 9 hours
          contig: 1 min
          map: 22 min
          scaff: 1 min

          reads are 80X for a 240Mb genome.

          Comment

          • id0
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2012
            • 130

            #6
            I had the same issue where SOAPdenovo would seem to be running forever. I waited for two weeks and there seemed to be no progress. I think the problem had to do with memory.

            I solved the problem by trimming the FASTQs prior to using them for SOAPdenovo. Having remains of adapters in the input sequences makes a huge difference.

            Comment

            • Gambarini
              Junior Member
              • Jan 2017
              • 1

              #7
              I had the same issue now, so I'm posting it in case someone else got into this.

              It looks like SOAPdenovo requires the sequences to have just one line. I formatted my files and it run just fine. Something like 5 minutes for a 4 million reads file.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              24 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              33 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...